Final Poll for CLOD?

[studiox19]

Hi Potz,

Yeah, i gave it a 10 - more of a 91 out of 100 though - so maybe a 9. i just think that if the game was released as it is now, after all the patches, i think we would all be pretty impressed. Admittedly, getting to here has been a rough ride and, in it's initial state, i would have given it 5/10. I think average pro reviews would now give it 85 - 95 out of 100 easily.

But hey, that's just my opinion . . . . . .

I'd like to hear from those who have now given it a 1 or 2 as well . . . . . .

[ATAG_Colander]

I think it would be more accurate to create 2 polls. One for online and one for offline.

I have the feeling the offline poll would give a smaller average than the online one.

[GOA_Potenz]

Originally Posted by studiox19

Hi Potz,

Yeah, i gave it a 10 - more of a 91 out of 100 though - so maybe a 9. i just think that if the game was released as it is now, after all the patches, i think we would all be pretty impressed. Admittedly, getting to here has been a rough ride and, in it's initial state, i would have given it 5/10. I think average pro reviews would now give it 85 - 95 out of 100 easily.

But hey, that's just my opinion . . . . . .

I'd like to hear from those who have now given it a 1 or 2 as well . . . . . .

first thanks for answer my question

I gave 6 out 10 cause, the lack of features, now we only have one game mode, online multiplayer dogfights, and the most good thing about 1946 was left it out and is Coop mode, also we have no dynamic campaign those rest so much point regarding game modes

Also what the devs advertised before release was not acomplished in many ways

the lack of AA rest a lot of points too.

I can keep going on and on but most of the flaws where already covered in this forums

and most important is the stop in supporting the tittle from devs

the first pro review gave the game just a 4.5 really bad for the reputation of the company, and after a year in my opinion just rise 1.5 points from that initial release.

Potz

Yes, to be realistic you need an online and offline poll.

Then you need to need to allow for the concerted 'Let's pm round and bump this and show them who is boss silly-high-score' campaign' and work back from there (and allow for Atag etc) and you may end up nearer the mark.

Equally, allow for the personal vendettas and negative campaigns, and you would probably end up with a 5/6. Hey, who needs history anyway....

[klem]

Well, at the risk of being called a fanboy for not completely condemning CoD I'd say that with 50% of the voters giving 7 to 8 it looks like it's "not great, disappointing in too many areas, but just about acceptable given the history.... and the fact that its not going anywhere else in a hurry".

I suppose 1C can take something from that. Let's hope they've learned the lesson and don't release the sequel until its absolutely ready.

Maybe we need another poll:
"Would you like to be a fully participating and serious member of a Sequel alpha/beta test team". And maybe with some clearly defined test tasks so we don't just get a pile of unsubstantiated 'opinion'.

I can dream.....