![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
| View Poll Results: Your score for the final version. | |||
| 1 |
|
8 | 2.66% |
| 2 |
|
2 | 0.66% |
| 3 |
|
12 | 3.99% |
| 4 |
|
21 | 6.98% |
| 5 |
|
36 | 11.96% |
| 6 |
|
46 | 15.28% |
| 7 |
|
77 | 25.58% |
| 8 |
|
77 | 25.58% |
| 9 |
|
15 | 4.98% |
| 10 |
|
7 | 2.33% |
| Voters: 301. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Same here 4/10. Even with the Desastersoft campaigns. Too many bugs affecting offline and coop play. For me that's not enough to continue flying CloD.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
4/10 for me.
__________________
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
7 out of 10 from me. Still having a blast online but there are just a few to many important omissions to make it rank higher IMO.
JD AKA_MattE
__________________
ASUS Crosshair IV Formula AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE @ 3.4ghz ZALMAN 120mm CPU Cooler Intel X25-M 160GB SSD Mushkin Enhanced Redline 8GB MSI R7970 OC ATI Catalyst 12.3 KINGWIN Mach 1 1000W COOLER MASTER HAF 932 MajorBoris "Question: Do you forum more than you fly?" raaaid "i love it here makes me look normal" |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
3. From me sorry but I cant help compare what was got with what they promised an I hoped for.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I gave it a 6 because the graphics are still unfinished and the SP play is so bad.
Not sure how anyone could vote 10 or 1 for that matter. Sarcasm votes I guess. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I gave it 5.
The lack of clouds ruins the game for me, they only appear close to you aircraft and they are the same as in old IL-2 just small puffs of cotton. Without clouds and some weather effect there is no flight sim experience. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
5 for me.
single player here -no dcg -radio commands That's it, I never really felt that all the fixes were so incredibly necessary. Performance wise the game always ran just fine for me, I liked the graphics mostly, FM/DM were ok. Yes a lot of things needed improving and improvements were made to great effect, I will not deny the devs my respect for their dedication. But my biggest gripe has always been the lack of single player content, especially a dynamic campaign, so people can actually fly and have unrepetitive fun, despite all the other things that needed fixing. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I give it a 4.
Very disapointed on the last year and a half.
__________________
---------------------------------------- Asus Sabertooth Z77 i7 3770k@4.3GHz+ Noctua NH D14 cooler EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked+ACX cooler. 8GB G.Skill ripjaws DDR3-1600 Crucial M4 128GB SSD+Crucial M4 256GB SSD Seagate 750GB HDD CH Fighterstick+CH Pro pedals+Saitek X45 Win7 64bit |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
After experiencing DCS: P-51D I give the IL-2 flight and aircraft models a 4. They just feel game-like in comparison. The bar has been raised.
The GUI and commands/ menu system in CloD get a 2. It's like they were designed by someone who has never seen a flight sim. There are basic commands missing and absurdly illogical ones like the zoom feature that uses the mouse and button combo. The game graphics get an 8 or 9 and the level of detail on the ground is astonishing. There's still a funny color palette and lack of weather. But the map is the best part of the sim. Also I give a 10 to how well it runs after the patch. For how well it looks it runs so smooth it's fantastic. The mission design included with the game gets a 5. All air starts or ground starts with the engine running is so arcade. Desastersoft I must try and it might be the whole redeeming feature. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
6/10 for me. Playing off line there's very little content, it's a bit of a desert to be fair, on the other hand I recognise that CloD's got a lot of depth at its core and is quite enjoyable just as a aircraft study sim. Nice.
|
![]() |
|
|