Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-13-2012, 05:18 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
Me 262 CG blah blah blah
The aerodynamic center moves under compressibility increasing the stability margin.

Two common methods of handling this are:

1. Add drag to slow the aircraft down below compressibility
2. If the CG is within limits<for that condition>, the aircraft will recover.

If you want to make the elevator effective enough to recover the aircraft, it must not violate the forward CG.

The forward CG limits defines the point you can raise the nose.

Under compressibility, behind the normal shock, the dynamic pressure is greatly reduced and the flow subsonic.

I am sure Mtt was aware of this fact.

Last edited by Crumpp; 06-13-2012 at 05:28 PM.
  #2  
Old 06-13-2012, 09:55 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

What happenend to your reply, Tagert?

Quote:
If the Germans fully understood swept wing theory..
Nobody fully understood swept wing theory until after the war. As the history notes, even Jones work in the United States was viewed with skeptism and far from mainstream.

Nobody fully understood the transonic and supersonic realms either.

Quote:
German swept-wing wind-tunnel data dispelled U.S. doubts
regarding the validity of R. T. Jones’ theoretical work.
What the Germans were, is far ahead of anyone else during the war. Their research became the foundation others like Northrop built upon.
  #3  
Old 06-14-2012, 01:18 AM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Nobody fully understood swept wing theory until after the war.
Bingo!

Now maybe tools will belive me?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.

Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 06-14-2012 at 01:37 AM.
  #4  
Old 06-14-2012, 02:28 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
Neither of which were done to take advantage of swept wing theory
That is not correct. It is impossible to argue that Mtt was not aware of swept wing theory.

Quote:
By 1945 the entire German aircraft industry had a multitude of experimental swept wing aircraft and missile designs in a final realization phase. Also, a Me 262 had been retrofitted with a 35 degree arrow wing and was ready for first flight. A further (Me 262 HG II) version with 45 degrees sweepback was under final construction at the end of WW II.
Quote:
The outer wings were swept to correct the cg.
Probably as result of the swept wing research and compressibility effects on the CG......

Mtt was obviously interested in adding futher sweep to the design.
  #5  
Old 06-14-2012, 02:32 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

While nobody fully understood swept wing theory, the Germans were light years ahead of anybody else.

In fact, Sir Sydney Camm, the designer of the Hurricane initially remarked, "Has anyone seen such a bloody useless" design concept upon seeing the German swept wing designs.
  #6  
Old 06-14-2012, 01:26 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
That is not correct.
That is your opinion and your welcome to it.. But I think Ill stick with what STORMBIRDS and Jenkins had to say on the subject. S!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #7  
Old 06-14-2012, 07:10 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
That is your opinion
That is not my opinion Tagert. It is what is written in:

Quote:
The Birth of Sweepback - Related Research at LFA-GermanyPeter G. Hamel∗
Given at:

Quote:
AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit
11-14 August 2003, Austin, Texas
Would you like a paper from Boeing summing up the German contribution to aerodynamics during WWII? I am sure you will hate it and be very disappointed.

You do know the father of modern fluid dynamics was not only German, there are pictures of him with von Kármán in the article.

Do you have a clue who Theodore von Kármán is and his role during the war?

The leading academics in aeronautical sciences were for the most part, colleagues and all knew each other before the war. Theodore von Kármán, the leading US scientist in aerodynamics, was a student of Ludwig Prandtl.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Prandtl
  #8  
Old 06-14-2012, 07:34 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
That is not my opinion
Well I don't know what else to tell you Crump

Other than I choose to take STORMBIRDS and Jenkins statements over yours with regards to the reasons why the Me262 wings were swept..

Why? Well I consider them to be more of an expert on the topic than you..

Please don't take it personal!

Which should be understandable when you consider the fact that Dennis Jenkins has written more aviation books than most people own or have read, and that the folks at STORMBIRDS clearly did their homework during the process of building reproductions of the Me262, that were so good that messerschmitt gave them continuation serial numbers

It just makes sense to go with what they said over what you said

Please don't take it personal!

But look at the bright side..

I did agree with what you had to say with regards to the Germans fully understanding swept wing theory during the war, when you said

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Nobody fully understood swept wing theory until after the war.
But as for the details as to the reason the wing was swept on the Me262, Ill have to stick with STORMBIRDS and Jenkins

S!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.