![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Two common methods of handling this are: 1. Add drag to slow the aircraft down below compressibility 2. If the CG is within limits<for that condition>, the aircraft will recover. If you want to make the elevator effective enough to recover the aircraft, it must not violate the forward CG. The forward CG limits defines the point you can raise the nose. Under compressibility, behind the normal shock, the dynamic pressure is greatly reduced and the flow subsonic. I am sure Mtt was aware of this fact. Last edited by Crumpp; 06-13-2012 at 05:28 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What happenend to your reply, Tagert?
Quote:
Nobody fully understood the transonic and supersonic realms either. Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bingo!
Now maybe tools will belive me? ![]()
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 06-14-2012 at 01:37 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Mtt was obviously interested in adding futher sweep to the design. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
While nobody fully understood swept wing theory, the Germans were light years ahead of anybody else.
In fact, Sir Sydney Camm, the designer of the Hurricane initially remarked, "Has anyone seen such a bloody useless" design concept upon seeing the German swept wing designs. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That is your opinion and your welcome to it.. But I think Ill stick with what STORMBIRDS and Jenkins had to say on the subject. S!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You do know the father of modern fluid dynamics was not only German, there are pictures of him with von Kármán in the article. Do you have a clue who Theodore von Kármán is and his role during the war? The leading academics in aeronautical sciences were for the most part, colleagues and all knew each other before the war. Theodore von Kármán, the leading US scientist in aerodynamics, was a student of Ludwig Prandtl. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Prandtl |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well I don't know what else to tell you Crump
Other than I choose to take STORMBIRDS and Jenkins statements over yours with regards to the reasons why the Me262 wings were swept.. Why? Well I consider them to be more of an expert on the topic than you.. Please don't take it personal! Which should be understandable when you consider the fact that Dennis Jenkins has written more aviation books than most people own or have read, and that the folks at STORMBIRDS clearly did their homework during the process of building reproductions of the Me262, that were so good that messerschmitt gave them continuation serial numbers It just makes sense to go with what they said over what you said Please don't take it personal! But look at the bright side.. I did agree with what you had to say with regards to the Germans fully understanding swept wing theory during the war, when you said But as for the details as to the reason the wing was swept on the Me262, Ill have to stick with STORMBIRDS and Jenkins S!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
![]() |
|
|