![]() |
|
|||||||
| Pilot's Lounge Members meetup |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
it says atmospheric lensing its 15 times bigger than gravitational lensing, how could eisntein have accounted for this, i dont say relativity is wrong i say einstein proof its invalid since he had no way to account for sun atmospheric lensin
dont you think my being fourth hit on relativity+ sun+ atmosphere proves i have original ideas which would be a shame censoring for being quite unique? my discovery: rounded lenses as planets atmosphere hardly cause any raimbow effect only triangular lenses do the kind of refraction depends weather the lens is poligonal or rounded
__________________
3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL |
|
|