|
|
|
|
#1
10-10-2011, 08:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
So you complain about how we can dare to raise critics on a beta patch because you think we don't understand the word "beta"? Well the word "patch" is also inside this, dear friends!
And patch in my opinion means that an existing thing is made better. I just don't understand why formerly working things need to be destroyed for placing new features - this is just not what I expect to be a "patch" - beta or not. Maybe we just need a new name for it.  midnight try-out or something like that...
|
|
#2
10-10-2011, 08:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects  |
|
#3
10-10-2011, 01:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#4
10-10-2011, 09:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
10-10-2011, 01:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#6
10-10-2011, 11:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Here we are not testing a "patch". We are testing a new version of the game. So we should not call it "Beta-Patch" but "CoD Version X - Beta". When the game will be finished (speaking about contents) then we'll be provided with real patches. Look at the ugly thing called "Red Orchestra 2": the game is complete but is a mess (so many bugs!) and I'm really mad at it, because without the bugs it would be enjoyable. This game needs patches. Instead I don't care about CoD's bugs since IMO it's still a unplayable game (and infact I'm not actually playing with it). This game needs to be finished.
__________________
 A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 10-10-2011 at 11:21 AM. |
|
#7
10-10-2011, 01:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#8
10-10-2011, 11:36 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
In this case the workd BETA supercedes the word patch.
And as some of us suspected, most of you do not understand this.
__________________
 Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#10
10-10-2011, 01:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
