The Battle of Britain Was The First Defeat For The German Luftwaffe.

[ATAG_Dutch]

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

Uhmmm is that so? Would you mind to refresh my memory and give me some examples of biased posts of mine? And I hope that with " biased" you don't mean "in disagreement with you"

Erm, Ok.

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

living in England has taught me that Britons are probably one of the most stubborn populations on this planet.

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

Dowding almost cost you the Battle of Britain, Harris wasted aircrews and hundreds of thousands of civilian lives with his ridiculous bombing campaign, which is regarded as a war crime

Regarded by whom, exactly?

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

it's a delusional idea man, it's propaganda for little people.

Oh, thanks very much.

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

declare war with what exactly? 5 Hurricanes and 10 Fairey Battles?

Ah, another demonstration of sound historical fact.

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

Do you really think that, had they really wanted to invade Britain, the Channel or the Royal Navy would have stopped them?

Yes, and so did Admiral Raeder.

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

You only have to feel ashamed for the bomber offensive perpetrated by Harris.

See my earlier post. - No we don't; I for one wasn't even born, and Harris was acting with the authority of the War Cabinet, headed by Churchill.

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

You had to wait for the Americans to show up in order to achieve that.

Not much cop us Brits, are we?

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

I'm sorry but that's wrong.

Surely you mean 'debatable'?

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

air superiority over Great Britiain and Northern Europe was achieved only when the Americans got there.

Ah, those helpful mates of ours again.

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

We should try and keep this conversation factual, with no national bias, but I understand it's not easy.

Absolutely agree.

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

The whole definition of "Battle of Britain" is somehow wrong: It was turned into "The Battle of Britain" by propaganda. The British propaganda was in dear need of some kind of victory.

"Bomber" Harris was the mastermind of setting European civilian targets on fire with his "an eye for an eye" attitude.

Back to the evil British War criminal Harris again.

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

Serious historians aren't politically biased in their judgements

So do you consider yourself a serious historian? Or is your bias more nationalist than political? Or more simply, anti-british?