![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The acceleration of the 190 is probably too poor ingame. Reports from wwiiaircraftperformance.org confirm this:
Navy test, Fw-190A5 vs. F6F-3 vs. F4U-1 "Relative accelerations, for all speed over 160 knots, showed both the F4U-1 and Fw-190 to be slightly superior to the F6F-3 and showed the F4U-1 to be slightly superior to the Fw-190 up to 15.000 feet, above which altitude, the Fw-190 had a slight advantage. At speeds less than 160 knots the F6F-3 and Fw-190 were equal." http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...0/ptr-1107.pdf Another report, again Fw-190A5 ..."The run is short as the aircraft accelarates rapidly"... ..."Airspeed acceleration after take-off is noticeably good"... http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...-47-1658-D.pdf According to these, the 190 had good acceleration. Ingame, its mediocre at best. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am also of the opinion that the Fw acceleration is worse than it should be (although much better since 4.11), plus its climb angle at least compared to Spits.
British tests of an A3 vs MkV and MkIX spits. ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by fruitbat; 05-29-2013 at 05:10 PM. |
![]() |
|
|