locked treads on IL-2 Sturmovik Forum

[Fjordmonkey]

Originally Posted by Osprey

You can go with that but you are wrong. These guys nailed their colours to the mast with fanfare before a line of code is written, before moderators were even appointed - this has been a victory for them and they've been celebrating the confirmation of removal of a ton of advanced features in excahge for 777 and a ROF engine (which looks terribly limited)

I'll go with what I believe is right, and you keep your stance. We'll never see eye to eye on it anyway.

[Davy TASB]

Originally Posted by Osprey

That is because their only goal was to destroy COD by badmouthing on these boards despite not even owning a copy of the sim. They are ROF fanboys through and through, God only knows what they think they would achieve by doing what they've done.

So ROF fanboys have killed CloD now.

Dear me.... this forum gets funnier by the day

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by Fjordmonkey

Proof of WHAT concept?

all programs have a Proof of Concept

[Fjordmonkey]

Originally Posted by Davy TASB

So ROF fanboys have killed CloD now.

Nah, it's been a well-known fact that the Roffers have killed off CLoD. Just like it's a well-known fact that the Creationists are right and Evolution is just a fantasy-story that Darwin created on his spare time.

Originally Posted by Davy TASB

Dear me.... this forum gets funnier by the day

Why do you think I stick around? It's a barrel of laughs, through and through.

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

all programs have a Proof of Concept

Yet you cannot describe what the SU-26 was actually a proof of concept of. Good to know.

[Wolf_Rider]

Do some research into it Fjordmonkey, instead of just running off at the keyboard, (like a good little one) you might actually learn something on which you can retain credibilty on in commenting

Did you read that thread through I linked you to? (betcha didn't

[bongodriver]

Originally Posted by Davy TASB

So ROF fanboys have killed CloD now.

Dear me.... this forum gets funnier by the day

Try looking at the oldest threads waaaay back and tell me anything really changed, the oldest post is some whinge by Furbs complaining about a 'promised' website looooong before release, so as you can see the famous double act have been working hard at it since the beginning.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=17410

[Meusli]

Originally Posted by Osprey

You are one of those who did their level best to destroy COD with your mouth on here - Look at your Avatar FFS!!! "Launcher has stopped working" created with your own hand. You don't even play COD!!! Yet in the new forums you are up Jason's backside about BOS. You and a minority like you have done a great dis-service to the oh so very niche flight sim community, you should hang your head in shame, what you and your pals have done makes me sick.

Makes you sick doesn't it. Well I hope the Luthier rumour is true and the guys at ATAG can finish CLOD as I do not feel like being part of a community of lickelspits.

[Fjordmonkey]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

Do some research into it Fjordmonkey, instead of just running off at the keyboard, (like a good little one) you might actually learn something on which you can retain credibilty on in commenting

To be perfectly frank, I don't really care what the SU-26 was ment to be a proof of concept of. What I DO care about is that the dev-resources that was put into the SU-26 would be far better spent on work actually benefiting the product that was already out, since there were areas that needed far more work (AI, campaign-system etc) than the -26 was. If that gives me less credibility in your eyes, well, I'll live with that.

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

Did you read that thread through I linked you to? (betcha didn't

First you have to link me something, since I'm not so good reading invisible things (yet)

[Osprey]

Originally Posted by Meusli

Makes you sick doesn't it. Well I hope the Luthier rumour is true and the guys at ATAG can finish CLOD as I do not feel like being part of a community of lickelspits.

After reading the responses to requests and requirements from Jason I'm not convinced at all. I too am hoping for a decent crack to COD. It's not 'the guys at ATAG' alone, there is a wider community effort. I know for one that two of the ACG guys have been approached about modding. I would feel more comfortable about the whole COD modding business if it were a community centric model since the moment you have 'ownership' you will just end up with the same UP/SAS/HSFX fragmentation.

Fjordmonkey, of course I don't think that a few individuals could've bust COD but they added their contribution - all that propaganda has an effect on sales and pressure from the publishers - don't think for a minute it doesn't. My point is that they did it nevertheless and now they are good little boys "yes Jason, 777 will save it, look at wonderful ROF and the great community it has". I don't buy it, and at this rate I won't either.

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by Fjordmonkey

To be perfectly frank, I don't really care what the SU-26 was ment to be a proof of concept of. What I DO care about is that the dev-resources that was put into the SU-26 would be far better spent on work actually benefiting the product that was already out, since there were areas that needed far more work (AI, campaign-system etc) than the -26 was. If that gives me less credibility in your eyes, well, I'll live with that.

well, I guess you're living with it then... enjoy

Originally Posted by Fjordmonkey

First you have to link me something, since I'm not so good reading invisible things (yet)

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...=36477&page=15


125, 126, 131, 132 and 147... can you see all this, Fjordmonkey... you must be able to, since you have quoted it. Do we need to lead you there by the hand and personally introduce you to it ?? Or do we just keep on pointing out you just seem to be here for nefarious reasons only?