Trying to play allowing losses is horrible

[Razorflame]

amen to that!

and sorry to let u in impy but you have some great runs so u got my respect! even tried some of them out which was fun

and on tiberiu's not

You really are one hell of a troll

by summing it up
1. you like to get people talk in a good or bad way
2. you actually don't contribute anything to these forums. but gladly get people annoyed
3. and on to post on impy's challengles you say that was all lame and blah blah well WHERE IS YOUR CHALLENGE? where is your SS? where is your YOUTUBE MOVIES? thats RIGHT nowhere! e.a read nr.2
4. i've observed u for quite some time now (not that could be missed) you seem like a very lonely person saying your smart and blah blah and then complaining about someone else his play
prolly cause you cannot do it (else show me otherwise in a vid, or just like to to prove something to someone else but lack the skill to do it properly)


and i bet your enjoying this so much

[tiberiu]

@ Impy.

First, no need to act this way matey. If you think I am a troll you can report my posts and my profile to the moderators of this forum. If they agree, I will be eliminated. Also you can set me on ignore and not respond to my posts.

Now to respond your points.

1) Your point is a BIG ad hominem attack on my person. This is a logical fallacy and I will not respond to such insulting nonsense.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

2) I talk this way in real life too with my friends. I never say "son" as an insult. Priests and the wise usually talk this way to others, do you think they mean it as an insult? I am very polite! I not want to harm or insult anybody. I am just stating some facts very blunt sometimes.

3) Well, smoking is indeed harmful and... you know how else you pay money to get poison. Not very smart if you ask me. But no need to argue about your personal problems here. There are psychologists which can help and programs that try to cure people from this. This forum is for Kings Bounty game so lets get back to the point. I may have worded my complainst in a sub-optimal way, but what I actually mean is that the game is poorly balanced if it allows 1 royal snake to beat 1000 bears. NOT that somebody who does it is stupid. I actually stated that it is logical and reasonable for the player to try to do no loss. I'm responsible for what I actually said not for what you wrongfully understand.

4) This is just another ad hominem attack from you against me, but I'll respond you a bit.

I helped some people here. Why do you ignore the facts? You are a lier sir. I never laughed at anybody nor insulted anybody like you say I did. I find it pitiful for somebody to find himself worthy for being respected and recognised on an internet forum. I am respected and recognised in the real life, in my chess community. I don't seek false fame over internet forums like others. Here I just exchange some ideas with some people and interact with others about a game.

5)Now when you win fight marked as impossible , that releases some endorphines doesn't it?

Yes, when it's a close battle with losts of casualties. When It's no-loss, it's just cookie cutter exploting and piece of cake abusing of some poor AI. Sorry it's just hard fact. The problem is that the game is unbalanced as it is, but I will mod it and will correct all the problems with the units. For example, all units that have running will have Run at reload 5. This will make it impossible for 1 snake to kill thousands of bears.

6.a- i look forward for challanging battles not cookie cutter exploits. Casting mana accelerator and phantoming a stack of inquisitors 1000 times in order to ressurect all your army is very poor game mechanic.
b- if they wanted to increase game time they shouldnt force players to rush through the game for a big score.
c- false. it's all about money, and the largest part of it comes form casual players, not veterans.

7. I don't know who you are nor care about you. I wrote what I wanted to write and expressed how I wanted as per my birthright to speak freely. If you think I did something against the rules to which I adhered to when signing up on this forum, report me to the moderators and stop complaining all the time. You give yourself too much credit. I wasn't reffering to you it was just a figure of speech.

You go on with another ad-homiem to which I won't respond because it's a logical fallacy and doesn't have a place in a civilized debate.

It means you have either no real knowledge of what you talking about here and never really played seriously hardcore

no it just means you make many assumptions about people you don't know just because they disagree with you

I never asked for any recognition for my challenges.

Good for you. I have nothing against you.

Take a breath Tiberiu, do whatever makes you happy, and if you do not want to change your ways then please leave me alone..

Change my ways? By this you mean "stop being logical and enjoying true challanges"? Then no. And I don't think I bothered you in any way. I did nothing to you. You should leave me alone if you don't have any advice to ask from me. I advise you to contact the moderators if you think I am a harmful and insulting troll.

This is my only and last replay to you if you do not address me more politely.

[Totoro]

If the game is possible to finish without losses on hardest difficulty it can be challenging for those who strive for no-losses but too easy for good players who don't care about it.

I don't think no-loss concept is good for those who play on its rules either, because when you've finished no-loss on impossible, there is nothing to look forward to.

If losses were inevitable and they would count to score, you could always try to improve your score by avoiding even more losses which would be much less stressful than trying to improve your score by finishing the game in fewer game days.

[Fatt_Shade]

@tiberiu
Who ever said on this WHOLE forum that no loss is `a must`, or that any1 not playing no loss is a noob, or stupid ??? No one !!! I havent seen a single post on this forum from no-loss player calling other to play that way, or telling some no loss obligation onto others.
But you in your first post to whole forum said no loss is stupid and wrong, and then stated you didnt insult anyone. Then in many other posts you tell players to just play and lose units, and dont lose time on it. If some1 want to play no loss, and ask question about it there are many to give advice how to do it. Your first reaction on this is to say dont play no loss, because if you do, then you`re stupid. Then in your wisdom, claimed `I`m smart player, and chessmaster and so great and so on... but then on forum ask how to open .kfs archive. Not very smart or bright are you?
1) Google.com
2) how to open .kfs file
3) press enter
4) profit

Priests and the wise usually talk this way to others, do you think they mean it as an insult?

Are you priest (which might clear some things about you loving to address other forum commenter as son) or a wise man(obviously aren`t) ?

I may have worded my complainst in a sub-optimal way, but what I actually mean is that the game is poorly balanced if it allows 1 royal snake to beat 1000 bears. NOT that somebody who does it is stupid.

Total and utter LIE. 90% of responds to your posts are disagreeing with you, and you still claim you didnt insult any!

1 royal snake to beat 1000 bears.

You posted this at least 100 times so far. pls send us all link to youtube where you actually dont this. No loss was never about losing time on 100 turn battle to finish, mine play with 100% crit archer army never took more then 10 minutes/battle 5-6 turns at most. How much time would take you to do 1 royal snake/1000 bears to finish? And what would be gain in that battle, except obvious exp for win, and lost time to finish it.

I helped some people here. Why do you ignore the facts? You are a lier sir.

Who did you help? Where is a single post of you giving some actual advice to any1 here? Useful information, technical fact... anything? And you call other liars also, but never give proof of it. I`m still w8 for response of you calling me liar in message, but never will get because you are wuss and liar yourself. Call me liar, when i ask when and where i lied on this forum, your response was `ill add you to my ignore list`. Such a boy of facts and reason you are.

Casting mana accelerator and phantom a stack of inquisitors 1000 times in order to resurrect all your army is very poor game mechanic.

There is function made by modder of HoMM3 for the Legend, that make all mana/rage income=0 after 20 battle turn. Problem solved after 20 turn absolute no more mana/rega what you had in 19th turn will have to do untill end of battle. No more abuse of magic spring, or and other exploit as you said for infinite mana, or phantom inquisitors for infinite rage. I asked you for some practical result considering your bitching on this exploits 20 days ago, never got reply. Because you never had a slightest idea how to solve it, and then claim `I helped some ppl here` Load of crap.

Change my ways? By this you mean "stop being logical and enjoying true challanges"? Then no.

That means to stop advertising onto other your way of thinking. If some1 ask for help/advice reply, dont make your first act `dont play no loss, it`s stupid (which you did many times already, in your short and pathetic activity on this forum). If you have some helpful idea on that tread title, share it. If your only response is to call players not to play certain way, then pls just dont reply on it.

And I don't think I bothered you in any way. I did nothing to you.

By calling other players ideas no fun and senseless`, you mean you did nothing to him. OK here i can see how you think your insults arent considered as such. It makes so much sense. Then me saying `tiberiu you`re piece of s..t` is not an insult at all ?

[Bhruic]

Originally Posted by Fatt_Shade

By calling other players ideas no fun and senseless`, you mean you did nothing to him. OK here i can see how you think your insults arent considered as such. It makes so much sense. Then me saying `tiberiu you`re piece of s..t` is not an insult at all ?

Dude, you really need to give it up. You are arguing with a troll. You cannot win. Look at how he responded to me in that "no loss" thread:

"I'm not insulting anybody. I am the one who is insulted. I never said that is wrong to try to do no-loss,. quite the contrary. But you must learn to read and to stop being an asshole."

Yes, that's right, in the same paragraph where he claims he's not insulting anyone, he calls me an asshole. Expecting any sort of rationality from him is futile. Save yourself the trouble and just put him on ignore, your forum experience will be much nicer (well, except for everyone quoting him, sadly).

[tiberiu]

Originally Posted by Bhruic

Dude, you really need to give it up. You are arguing with a troll. You cannot win.

You say that to all people who disagree with you? Grow up..

[Fatt_Shade]

just one example out of dozens: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=35939

Wow you tell him to lvlup skills, and then quote skill descriptions from hero screen and claim that is help, and brilliant advice. This is priceless.
I asked specific question to you how to solve infinite mana/rage problem as you stated and no response, because you haven`t a slightest idea how this game mechanic works.

And again i`m liar. WHEN and WHERE ? You said so 20 days ago, before my last posts to you, so be true to your words and present proof of your claims.

[tiberiu]

Originally Posted by Fatt_Shade

@tiberiu

Who did you help? Where is a single post of you giving some actual advice to any1 here? Useful information, technical fact... anything?

just one example out of dozens: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=35939

You are a liar. Thanks for proving it. Leave me alone, you and your troll friends.

PS: "Total and utter LIE. 90% of responds to your posts are disagreeing with you, and you still claim you didnt insult any!" <<< Argumentum ad populum. Just because more people say A is true then that A is false, it doesn't mean A is indeed true. Get your hands on a logic book. You seem to need it pretty hard. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum