Trying to play allowing losses is horrible

[Razorflame]

Originally Posted by Bhruic

I'm not the least bit angry, but thanks for your concern.



Actually, I'm quite good at logic. Unfortunately, your argument boils down to "if you can do it, they must have intended for you to do it", which is a stupid argument. Again, one only point to such examples as the infinite runes/crystals/XP exploits available to realize that there are quite a few things you can do in the game that almost certainly weren't intended to be done in the game.

Regardless, this will be my last post to you, and you shall be added to my ignore list, as you are incapable of having a discussion without attempting personal attacks. Regardless of your physical age, you are extremely juvenille, and I'm wasting my time responding - which I shall now cease to do.

well you have to admit that even without cheats/exploits the game is still to easy

just a simple comparison

in TL: AP I really had fun on impossible cause it felt challenging even if u already won the game and stuff or want to try a different character

but in wotn it's just about killing massive undead stacks and then some small continents of other stuff

but by that time you will have such a impressive army/skill/spell choice
that later islands just don't matter
IN TL and AP i think the islands were better constructed in terms of difficulty

in wotn you mainly have to kill undead stacks which tend to be very tedious after a while and boring it really doesn't give u a feeling that your progressing

[Bhruic]

Originally Posted by Razorflame

well you have to admit that even without cheats/exploits the game is still to easy

My take on it is that they gave us too many tools, and too many ways to exploit those tools when it comes to resurrecting units. There are very few fights that I've done where I haven't lost a single unit. Mainly that's only happened on the Freedom Islands, and that's because I didn't figure out how to get there until after Demonis.

So most fights involve losses. It's much too easy to regain all those losses with units such as Paladins and Inquisitors, especially when mixed with Rune Mages. If there were no way for units to resurrect units, and there were no way to gain effectively infinite mana, most fights would involve some losses.

That doesn't really address the question of how difficult the game is, but a lot of the perception of difficulty comes from unit loss.

The other side of the equation is how to determine how difficult something should be. Take the Spider Boss, for example. Lots of people had trouble even beating it, let alone doing so with no-loss. And because of that, the perception came into play (before ways of exploiting the fight, and before the discovery of Trolls) that the fight was "too hard". Trying to find a middle ground is difficult when people have different expectations of what they consider "hard".

tl;dr version - a lot fewer ways to resurrect units would go a long way to making the game seem harder, but could make it more tedious.

[Zechnophobe]

I don't really think resurrection is the issue. A big part of the 'easiness' of the game is that the areas don't escalate well. Consider that at each breakpoint (Island 1, island 4, post Demonis) you have a 'gate' that prevents you from going further. Up until that gate you have a certain strength of enemies, roughly scaled by zone. Demonis has larger stacks than Greenwort.

The problem is that these stack sizes are not making a very good curve. All the armies pre-demonis are TINY in comparison to Demonis. You can clear out that entire area with basically no problem once you get some levels, because the fights aren't scaling with you.

Or think of it like this: Let's say it takes 5 level 10 fights to get to level 11. Or, 5 fights of a specific level to get to the next level. There are like 200 level 30 fights to 35 fights! Then none of levels 36 to 43, and then some at level 44 onward. You basically have to fight these 'easy' lower level fights for a long time before you are given any challenge again.

Afterall, I don't think anyone will really call the first four islands too easy. It's just that there are gigantic stretches of the game that aren't particularly hard because the enemies aren't getting larger.

[Bhruic]

I'd have to disagree. When I first got to Greenwort, the fights were generally fairly difficult. The same was true when I moved to Arlania and Verlon Wasteland. I didn't have any losses, thanks to resurrection exploits, but I often had a few rounds of resurrecting at the end of each fight indicating I'd lost quite a few units. Certainly, I wouldn't say I was in danger of actually losing any of those fights, but I wasn't simply steamrolling the enemy.

The fights in Demonis were substantially harder, but I hadn't figured out how to get to the Freedom Isles, so hadn't got all the XP from the fights there. When I finally got there, yes, all the fights were quite easy, but I'd over-leveled them by doing the Demonis/Hades stuff. Had I done those in the reverse direction, I suspect the former would have been easier, and the latter harder. I suppose I should include Merlassar in there, as it was mixed in with the Greenwort/Arlania/Verlon stuff.

I suppose part of the issue is the very mobility that implies. You have a lot more areas to work with at that point in the game, so you aren't forced into fights you might not win. This, of course, is especially compounded by the ability to fly - giving you the ability to skip any fight you don't want to fight. So you end up in a situation where you've got superior resurrecting troops, with large amounts of fights to choose from, in a situation where you aren't roadblocked for quite some time. That definitely is going to give the impression of being significantly easier.

[blacklegionary]

Originally Posted by Bhruic

I'd have to disagree. When I first got to Greenwort, the fights were generally fairly difficult. The same was true when I moved to Arlania and Verlon Wasteland. I didn't have any losses, thanks to resurrection exploits, but I often had a few rounds of resurrecting at the end of each fight indicating I'd lost quite a few units. Certainly, I wouldn't say I was in danger of actually losing any of those fights, but I wasn't simply steamrolling the enemy.

The fights in Demonis were substantially harder, but I hadn't figured out how to get to the Freedom Isles, so hadn't got all the XP from the fights there. When I finally got there, yes, all the fights were quite easy, but I'd over-leveled them by doing the Demonis/Hades stuff. Had I done those in the reverse direction, I suspect the former would have been easier, and the latter harder. I suppose I should include Merlassar in there, as it was mixed in with the Greenwort/Arlania/Verlon stuff.

I suppose part of the issue is the very mobility that implies. You have a lot more areas to work with at that point in the game, so you aren't forced into fights you might not win. This, of course, is especially compounded by the ability to fly - giving you the ability to skip any fight you don't want to fight. So you end up in a situation where you've got superior resurrecting troops, with large amounts of fights to choose from, in a situation where you aren't roadblocked for quite some time. That definitely is going to give the impression of being significantly easier.

Well now I understand why you say the Ghoul in Greenwort is a threat to no-loss. In my second playthrough, I moved around Darion, Merlessar and the Isle of Freedom and I see that Greenwort, Verlon Wasteland and Western Isle have roughly the same enemy strength. Merlessar, Eastern Isle and Arlania is the same, too and stronger than these previous areas but not much. So if you do them before Demonis but after finish all Darion stuff, it's not much different.

You were right about mobility, there are many easy fights to pick and you aren't forced to fight "Impossible" fight.

[Zechnophobe]

Originally Posted by Bhruic

I'd have to disagree. When I first got to Greenwort, the fights were generally fairly difficult. The same was true when I moved to Arlania and Verlon Wasteland. I didn't have any losses, thanks to resurrection exploits, but I often had a few rounds of resurrecting at the end of each fight indicating I'd lost quite a few units. Certainly, I wouldn't say I was in danger of actually losing any of those fights, but I wasn't simply steamrolling the enemy.

Sure, because at that point they were level appropriate. If you just do Darion, and then go to Demonis, it is a generally difficult progressions.

The fights in Demonis were substantially harder, but I hadn't figured out how to get to the Freedom Isles, so hadn't got all the XP from the fights there. When I finally got there, yes, all the fights were quite easy, but I'd over-leveled them by doing the Demonis/Hades stuff. Had I done those in the reverse direction, I suspect the former would have been easier, and the latter harder. I suppose I should include Merlassar in there, as it was mixed in with the Greenwort/Arlania/Verlon stuff.

This is the point. All the fights in Freedom Isles and Merlessar are 'before' Demonis in difficulty. And if you do them in order of difficulty, you end up doing a huge amount of really easy fights. By skipping the easy ones, you just artificially make the rest of the game harder.

I suppose part of the issue is the very mobility that implies. You have a lot more areas to work with at that point in the game, so you aren't forced into fights you might not win. This, of course, is especially compounded by the ability to fly - giving you the ability to skip any fight you don't want to fight. So you end up in a situation where you've got superior resurrecting troops, with large amounts of fights to choose from, in a situation where you aren't roadblocked for quite some time. That definitely is going to give the impression of being significantly easier.

I stopped using Runemages after doing a chunk of Darion, because they completely sucked the fun out of anything. Didn't use any resurrectors until Demonis, when I picked up some Demonologists. So, yeah. At the end of all things, the game is still very easy and ress or not makes no difference. It's just one way of arriving at ease.

[Bhruic]

Originally Posted by Zechnophobe

Sure, because at that point they were level appropriate. If you just do Darion, and then go to Demonis, it is a generally difficult progressions.

Well, yes, because the game design seems to indicate you should do the Freedom Isles and Merlassar before Demonis.

This is the point. All the fights in Freedom Isles and Merlessar are 'before' Demonis in difficulty. And if you do them in order of difficulty, you end up doing a huge amount of really easy fights. By skipping the easy ones, you just artificially make the rest of the game harder.

Well, not, that's not the point I was making. My point was that they were easy because I did Demonis first. Had I not done Demonis (and Hades), those fights would have been more challenging simply because I wouldn't have had the extra levels from Demonis/Hades. And had I done Freedom Isle before Demonis/Hades, yes, the latter would have been easier, but probably not substantially so.

I stopped using Runemages after doing a chunk of Darion, because they completely sucked the fun out of anything. Didn't use any resurrectors until Demonis, when I picked up some Demonologists. So, yeah. At the end of all things, the game is still very easy and ress or not makes no difference. It's just one way of arriving at ease.

If I recall correctly, you are using a mostly level 5 army composition (dragons figure prominently, don't they?). Yes, that's another way of making things easier. Resurrection abilities aren't the only way that can be accomplished, just the most visible.

Basically, the units in the game aren't well balanced. Unit resurrection abilities again rank high in that list, but there are a lot of other areas. I suspect that if someone were to try a playthrough and (past the first 4 islands) only play with level 1-2 units, it would be considerably more challenging.

At this point, however, barring a complete rebalance of units/spells/skills/abilities taking place, the only way to make things "harder" is to give the AI more units - which is only a marginal improvement - or make the AI make better decisions - which is also only a marginal improvement.

[Razorflame]

Originally Posted by Bhruic

Well, yes, because the game design seems to indicate you should do the Freedom Isles and Merlassar before Demonis.



Well, not, that's not the point I was making. My point was that they were easy because I did Demonis first. Had I not done Demonis (and Hades), those fights would have been more challenging simply because I wouldn't have had the extra levels from Demonis/Hades. And had I done Freedom Isle before Demonis/Hades, yes, the latter would have been easier, but probably not substantially so.



If I recall correctly, you are using a mostly level 5 army composition (dragons figure prominently, don't they?). Yes, that's another way of making things easier. Resurrection abilities aren't the only way that can be accomplished, just the most visible.

Basically, the units in the game aren't well balanced. Unit resurrection abilities again rank high in that list, but there are a lot of other areas. I suspect that if someone were to try a playthrough and (past the first 4 islands) only play with level 1-2 units, it would be considerably more challenging.

At this point, however, barring a complete rebalance of units/spells/skills/abilities taking place, the only way to make things "harder" is to give the AI more units - which is only a marginal improvement - or make the AI make better decisions - which is also only a marginal improvement.

your examples a re bit touchy

first you say the res abilties making it to easy
(there are some builds that don't even need RESU or level 5 units)

the units are just okay ( only wotn made some mistakes by making some overpowered)

you should check in the AP forum where impy and some others tried finishing the game with low level units and that is even possible(although not in a no loss run)

I really find it very amusing how people keep saying units are unbalanced and stuff

but if you are here from the beginning start of TL
you could gradually see how people got into the heck of things and really made things easier!
but as today not alot of new stuff is being invented so they put some new OP units in and pretty imbalance the enemy strenght


and if you don't believe me just look at the early stages of TL when people found out how to get this game as no loss (which was then still unheard of)
then with KB:ap they put some new stuff in and some new combo's but pretty much the same

whereas in wotn the game is badly written there are hardly new stuff being invented (the viking race isn't so great) I find it kinda funny that we are forced to use crappy viking units for 4 islands long
whereas when u go beyond that people will still use their combo's what they used before in AP and TL
and prolly for the most medicore people they will just use the paladin/ingi combo because it easy and hardly effect morale penalties and therefore also not making the human race inferior

I mean people have finished TL:Ap:CW with one stack of a unit(dragons were most famous)

I bet people can do so again in WOTN if you had the ability of kiting or at least give some better unit selection

But you are forced to use the viking race LITERALLY and even with such a weak race your just obliterating the undead. There is hardly a chance of fighting vs other stacks unless u are really dedicated on finishing this game a sa viking(which requires a lot of traveling back for the right units of vikings


I will bet that most experts from TL/ap/cw will say WOTN is the worst installment of KB