|
|
|||||||
| Pilot's Lounge Members meetup |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
08-28-2012, 05:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Well looks awesome, we need him on COD now.
Perhaps he can fix the Spit cockpit first, I mean its only being over a year  and still nothing works in it correctly compared to the 109... 
__________________
 Quote:
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. 
|
|
#2
08-28-2012, 05:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The visual effects look great. Does anyone have a link to the SAS thread for this? can't find it
It's inexplicable why the COD dev's & 1C are not opening up selected parts of COD for the talented modders to improve content & funtionality. IMO this could only serve to (1) improve flagging interest in the sim (2) release the dev's to concentrate on the game engine (3) 1C gets a better overall sim product "for free".
__________________
When one engine fails on a two engine bomber, you will always have enough power left to get to the scene of the crash. Get the latest COD Team Fusion patch info HERE
|
|
#4
08-28-2012, 10:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
As nice as it looks, it will be useless unless every single flyable has a similarly developed cockpit.
How long will that take? Or is this just animated control switches and not full real CEM/cockpit management?
__________________
 Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
|
|
#5
08-28-2012, 06:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
08-28-2012, 08:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 Time will tell 
__________________
Quote:
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
|
|
#7
08-28-2012, 08:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
il2 46 cannot be compared with CoD. Look closely at il2 46 aircraft and objects. Yes, il2 46 looks fine on Youtube, but closer comparison reveals that il2 46 is a previous generation.
I've been with il2 since 2002 and it was the best. But time has moved on. Best Regards, MB_Avro.
|
|
#8
08-28-2012, 09:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well at least it works!
|
|
#9
08-28-2012, 10:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Il-2 1946 (with mods) has a far more convincing air combat experience. I have yet to see a fighter or stuka badly hit grenade into "a million pieces" in CloD, for example. CloD has a long way to go before it surpasses '46. All these years and it still seems like I've only experienced a fraction of what it has to offer.
|
|
#10
08-28-2012, 10:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Sterjnaeger.
Out of frustration I popped into '46 4.11.1 last night on a mad dogfight server. Yes, its dated although those new graphics look good. Flight models felt a bit 'soft' but that may just be me. Enjoyed it for a manic half hour and wouldn't mind getting onto a more serious server again (SpitsVs109s was empty). The gameplay is still there. btw what is Histomod? I have an outdated UltraPack and the vanilla 4.11.1.
__________________
klem 56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds" http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/  ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
