Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 06-08-2012, 01:42 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Duh...

damn Ti89 and my old brain.

Quote:
Conclusion, P47D has slightly better dive acceleration when reaching 750-850km/h if both propeller efficiency=80%. I think this is the il2 FM method, if you test both in il2 4.11m, You'll find slightly dive acceleration difference.
Go back and read the flight test results. This gives a good approximation of the performance you will see in the air.

Quote:
However, if fw190A8 propeller efficiency drops from 80% to 50% at 850km/h,
And the P47's CSP is going to drop too, blackberry. I like the idea you present with modeling efficiency. Problem is you are making the same mistake the NACA did in adopting the 16 series. The calculations just did not bear out and give good agreement with the air.

Just a thought, a generic modification of efficiency based on some basics of propeller design might enhance things. Problem is we don't have enough information on the propellers to implement any kind of detail.

Last edited by Crumpp; 06-08-2012 at 02:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.