![]() |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Most of the weight (mass) of the BMW engine is FORWARD of the cg.. Which is explains why the OUTER wing was swept BACKWARDS As in to put some weight (mass) behind the cg to counter the weight (mass) of BMW engine sticking out ahead of the cg.. Quote:
And is the essance of my point As for 40%, I don't know if I would go as far as to say 40% of the weight (mass).. In that assumes a uniform distribution of weight of the engine, framing, skin, etc. But I think we can all agree that there is more weight (mass) behind the cg due to the replacement of the BMW with the Jumo.. With that said, we know.. The cg was 'set' for the BMW configuration The cg will 'change' with the replacement of the BMW with the Jumo The additional weight (mass) behind the cg has to be offset with weight (mass) added ahead of the cg. Which is explains why the INNER wing was swept FORWARD As in to put some weight (mass) ahead of the cg to counter the weight (mass) of Jumo engine sticking out behind the cg.. Hope that helps! S!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 06-07-2012 at 07:41 PM. |
|
|