Bug 174 on 12lbs boost. Review please.

[Osprey]

Originally Posted by robtek

You wont find a post from me arguing against 100 octane fuel for the FC, only not to exclude 87 octane!

Oh, i'll vote, as soon as i see you've voted for bug #200

Hmmm, I might take up that challenge because you've certainly implied that it wasn't in full use. Nobody has argued to exclude 87 here though, we've been arguing that for BoB that 100 needs to be modelled, because it isn't.

I've said before, I only vote for things I know about.

[Crumpp]

you've certainly implied that it wasn't in full use.

It wasn't in full use until very late in the Battle depending on the dates you end it.

If you use 15 September it was never in full use.

If you use December 1940, it might have been in full use and if you use the German dates of May 1941, it was definately in full use.

[Al Schlageter]

Originally Posted by Crumpp

It wasn't in full use until very late in the Battle depending on the dates you end it.

If you use 15 September it was never in full use.

If you use December 1940, it might have been in full use and if you use the German dates of May 1941, it was definately in full use.

We are all still waiting for you to name those FC squadrons that were still using 87 octane fuel before the end of September. Can't, then they must have been using 100 octane fuel.

[fruitbat]

Originally Posted by Crumpp

It wasn't in full use until very late in the Battle depending on the dates you end it.

If you use 15 September it was never in full use.

If you use December 1940, it might have been in full use and if you use the German dates of May 1941, it was definately in full use.

Its no good saying that without something substantial to back it up.

So much has evidence from a myriad of sources has been posted that disagrees with your contention.

[bongodriver]

Oh god.......and now the inevitable excuse from Crumpp.........

[whiny nasal jobsworth desk jockey voice on]

'But aircraft can only use a specified fuel....it says so in books and manuals'

[stupid voice thing off]

[Glider]

Originally Posted by Crumpp

It wasn't in full use until very late in the Battle depending on the dates you end it.

If you use 15 September it was never in full use.

If you use December 1940, it might have been in full use and if you use the German dates of May 1941, it was definately in full use.

PLaying devils advocate, your evidence for the full use in May 1941 is what?

[bongodriver]

should really be asking for evidence of it 'not' being in full use before may 1941.

[Glider]

Originally Posted by bongodriver

should really be asking for evidence of it 'not' being in full use before may 1941.

I disagree. Crumpp has made a definate statement that 100 Octane was in full use in May 1941, all I want is his evidence that says it was May 1941.

Crumpp is very keen on us supporting anything we say and I want to know what his evidence is for May 1941.

[Osprey]

Originally Posted by Crumpp

It wasn't in full use until very late in the Battle depending on the dates you end it.

If you use 15 September it was never in full use.

If you use December 1940, it might have been in full use and if you use the German dates of May 1941, it was definately in full use.

You have been presented with an ENORMOUS amount of evidence to the contrary yet you STILL go on and on and on and on and on and on and on like you are right, even though you have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to support what you are talking about.