Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-04-2012, 07:08 PM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Blenheim IV manual amendment 3 issued no later than January 1940 says 100 octane in the outer fuel tanks. I'd therefore disagree that BC did not use 100 octane until August 1940.
  #2  
Old 06-04-2012, 09:14 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JtD View Post
Blenheim IV manual amendment 3 issued no later than January 1940 says 100 octane in the outer fuel tanks. I'd therefore disagree that BC did not use 100 octane until August 1940.
Agree. In addition the papers David showed specifically mention that ca. 3-4 Bomber Command stations were only to be supplied with 100 octane fuel.

So I guess the million dollar question is who (BC Stations, FC Stations, manufacturers etc.) used and what amount of the fuel, and in what role (operational/non-operational flights, test trials).
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
  #3  
Old 06-04-2012, 09:59 PM
Seadog Seadog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
Agree. In addition the papers David showed specifically mention that ca. 3-4 Bomber Command stations were only to be supplied with 100 octane fuel.

So I guess the million dollar question is who (BC Stations, FC Stations, manufacturers etc.) used and what amount of the fuel, and in what role (operational/non-operational flights, test trials).
Show us evidence for at least one operational 87 octane RAF FC combat sortie during the BofB or admit that you have no evidence to contradict the multiple sources that state 100% 100 octane use by RAF FC during the BofB, such as:


Quote:
...I do not believe that it is generally recognised how much this
superiority would have been affected had not the decision been
taken to base aircraft engine design on the use of 100-octane
fuel instead of the pre-war standard grade of 87-octane rating.
In fact, it was only a few months before the Battle of Britain
that all fighters were changed over from 87- to 100-octane
fuel, a change which enabled the Rolls-Royce Merlin engine
of that period to be operated at an increased supercharger
pressure which immediately gave an extra 200 h.p. or more.

Subsequent engine developments made possible by the use of
100-octane instead of 87-octane fuel have since permitted a
truly phenomenal increase in the power of the original engine
without any change in its basic size or capacity.
It is very interesting to refer back to the records of serious
discussions which took place only a year or two before the war
when certain authorities expressed the very gravest misgivings
at the proposal to design engines to require a '' theoretical type
of fuel" (i.e., 100 octane), which they feared would not be
available in adequate quantity in time of war, since we were
mainly dependent on America for its supply. Fortunately for
Britain, the majority of those directly concerned took a different
view, and I might quote a rather prophetic statement made by
an Air Ministry official at a Royal Aeronautical Society meeting
in February, 1937, who, in referring to the advent of
100 octane, said: " Let there be no doubt, however, that
petroleum technologists and fuel research workers now have
the opportunity to provide by their efforts an advance in aircraft
engine development, with its effect on air power, which
the engine designer by himself cannot hope to offer by any
other means."
May I conclude by also quoting a reply reported to have
been made recently in the U.S.A. by Mr. Geoffrey Lloyd, M.P.,
Joint Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Fuel and
Power, in answer to the question: " Do you think 100 octane
was the deciding factor in the Battle of Britain in 1940 ? "
To which Mr. Lloyd replied: " I think we would not have won
the Battle of Britain without 100 octane—but we DID have
the 100 octane."

Nevertheless, let us not forget that between the fuel and the
airscrew there are also many other links in the chain, any one
of which, had it failed, could have vitally affected the issue,
while all the technical superiority in the world would, of course,
have been of no avail at all without the efficient training, skill,
and courage in combat of the Battle of Britain pilots.


Flight Magazine, Jan 06 1944
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchi...0-%200044.html
  #4  
Old 06-04-2012, 10:10 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Seadog, do I take it right that your most serious evidence for 100% 100 octane fuel use is a wartime British article from a aviation magazine?
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
  #5  
Old 06-04-2012, 10:22 PM
Seadog Seadog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
Seadog, do I take it right that your most serious evidence for 100% 100 octane fuel use is a wartime British article from a aviation magazine?
That article excerpt was at hand; but it states unequivocally that 100 octane was in universal use. The evidence for 100% 100 octane use by RAF FC during the BofB is extensive and overwhelming. There are multiple other sources that state 100% 100 octane use during the BofB, and more that infer 100% use, but no sources have ever been produced or presented by you to challenge these sources. You talk about "serious evidence" and then present us with absolutely laughable material that long predates the BofB. You use the methods of a holocaust denier and then expect us to swallow it hook, line and sinker.

You can't produce evidence for a even single operational 87 octane RAF FC sortie during the BofB.
  #6  
Old 06-05-2012, 01:30 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
Seadog, do I take it right that your most serious evidence for 100% 100 octane fuel use is a wartime British article from a aviation magazine?
You have been using a reference to an article in a 1950's copy of 'Flight' to say that it wasn't used. You even posted the article in Bug 174 but I had it removed because it wasn't actual evidence.

Such hypocracy........

Last edited by Osprey; 06-05-2012 at 01:33 PM.
  #7  
Old 06-05-2012, 08:35 PM
Seadog Seadog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 226
Default more sources

Yet another RAF force multiplier was high-octane fuel. When the war began, both the Luftwaffe and the RAF were using 87 octane aviation fuel. Beginning in May 1940, the RAF obtained 100 octane fuel from the United States and used it throughout the battle. It boosted the performance of the Merlin engines in the Hurricanes and Spitfires from 1,000 to about 1,300 horsepower.
http://www.airforce-magazine.com/Mag...808battle.aspx


By the summer of 1940,
modiications had improved the
performance of the Spitire and
Hurricane. The Spitire’s original
two-blade wooden propeller was
replaced, irst by variable pitch
three-blade units, and then by a
constant-speed unit. This signiicantly
improved take-of performance and the
vital rate of climb. From May 1940 the
use of 100-octane fuel, as used in the
1931 Schneider Trophy races, increased
the Merlin’s performance from 1,000 to
some 1,300hp.
p77

70th Anniversary of the Battle of Britain
Published in association with Royal Air Force Media and
Communications, Headquarters Air Command
www.raf.mod.uk


The most dramatic benefit of the earliest Houdry units was in the production of 100-octane aviation gasoline, just before the outbreak of World War II. The Houdry plants provided a better gasoline for blending with scarce high-octane components, as well as by-products that could be converted by other processes to make more high-octane fractions. The increased performance meant that Allied planes were better than Axis planes by a factor of 15 percent to 30 percent in engine power for take-off and climbing; 25 percent in payload; 10 percent in maximum speed; and 12 percent in operational altitude. In the first six months of 1940, at the time of the Battle of Britain, 1.1 million barrels per month of 100-octane aviation gasoline was shipped to the Allies. Houdry plants produced 90 percent of this catalytically cracked gasoline during the first two years of the war.
http://www.nacatsoc.org/history.asp?HistoryID=30



That process would make a crucial difference in mid-1940, when the Royal Air Force started filling its Spitfires and Hurricanes with 100-octane gasoline imported from the United States instead of the 87 octane it had formerly used. Luftwaffe pilots couldn't believe they were facing the same planes they had fought successfully over France a few months before. The planes were the same, but the fuel wasn't. In his 1943 book The Amazing Petroleum Industry, V. A. Kalichevsky of the Socony-Vacuum Oil Company explained what high-octane gasoline meant to Britain: "It is an established fact that a difference of only 13 points in octane number made possible the defeat of the Luftwaffe by the R.A.F. in the fall of 1940. This difference, slight as it seems, is sufficient to give a plane the vital `edge' in altitude, rate of climb and maneuverability that spells the difference between defeat and victory."
http://www.mindfully.org/Technology/...tane1oct04.htm

The second was the lack of suitable
engines to power a heavy bomber. The
"difficulties experienced by German engine
manufacturers in producing engines that met
comparable performance standards of
American and British industry," limited the
design and performance of their aircraft.38
This was partly due to the late start German
engineers had in designing high-performance
engine types and partly due to the low octane
fuels on hand to operate them. The Germans
entered the war using 87–89 octane fuels.
This octane rating, however, could only be
achieved "by adding 15–18 percent aromatics
with tetraethyl lead to the synthetic fuel."39
In contrast, during the Battle of Britain the
British used 100 octane fuels supplied by the
United States
.

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ww2/batlbrit.pdf

The plant at Heysham, together with those at Stanlow and Billingham produced iso-octane additives required to raise 87 octane fuel to 100 octane rating. Initially, the limited size of the 100 octane fuel stockpile required strict rationing until supplies could be increased to meet requirements and the 100 octane fuel was dyed green to distinguish it from the 87 octane fuel which was blue.
Bulk supply contracts for higher octane fuel were placed by the Air Ministry and it was put into widespread use in the RAF in March 1940 when Spitfires' Rolls Royce Merlin engines were converted to use the 100 octane fuel.

By May 1940, reconnaissance Spitfires had begun flying combat missions using the 100 octane fuel. By 31 July 1940, there were 384 Spitfires serving in 19 squadrons using the 100 octane fuel.

http://www.heyshamheritage.org.uk/html/trimpell.html

February 16
All the Squadron aircraft [Hurricane 151 squadron] had been modified to enable them to operate on 100 Octane fuel. This gave the capability of operation at +12 boost to meet operational emergencies without damage to the engines.

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/kelsey.family/1940.htm

The Allies have an important advan-
tage over Germany because of their un-
limited access to the highest-grade
aviation fuels.
"Petroleum Press Service," official Journal
of the British oil industry, states that, until
recently, the fuel most widely used, both by
civil and military aircraft, had an octane (or
measure of anti-knock value) rating of around
87, but that there Is now a rapidly growing
tendency to use 100 octane spirit. This enables
the compression ratio of an engine to be
Increased, and, therefore, raises the power.
Spirit of an octane rating of 87 generally
is obtained by the addition of small quantities
of tetra-ethyl lead to good-quality "straight
run" petrol. Germany, it is thought, Is un-
likely to suffer from a shortage of this grade
of fuel.
But if, as Is probable, the Allies eventually
resort to the almost exclusive use of 100
octane fuel, Germany's problem will be more
difficult, for there are definite technical limits
to the use of lead 'c'opa," the only practicable
way of producing 100 octane spirit being to
employ high-qualitv blending agente, such as
"mixed octanes."

Seven or eight plants for the manufacture ol
this vital blending material, with an aggregate
capacity of about 100,000 tons a year, are now in
operation or under construction In Germany.
This quantity would be sufficient for the pro-
duction of about 220,000 tons of 100 octane
aviation petrol-a total which might possibly
be raised to 400,000 tons by the end of 1941
if adequate quantities of other high-octane
blending agents could be spared for the
purpose.
In view of the heavy military consumption
of aircraft fuel by Germanv, however, and
because the total supply of petrol is limited
and big hydrogénation plants are vulnerable
to air attack, her prospects would not appear
to be enviable on the basis of existing
knowledge

The Sydney Morning Herald, April 3 1940

Secrets of the Heinkel
(By Air Mail)
LONDON.
ALTHOUGH the Heinkel III,

which had a "happy landing" to the west of the Maginot Line, after its personnel had found safety in parachutes, revealed no secrets of German aircraft-most of the apparatus had been thrown out by the parachutes-a similar plane shot down later in Scotland proved a veritable mine for the R.A.F. experts.

It is revealed that the Germans use a feed pump regulating the flow through injectors of tiny particles of gasoline direct into each cylinder. The gas ls injected in a fanwise spray and comes into contact with supercharged air heated under pressure.

One advantage is the elimination of freezing which is prolific of air accidents. This is especially important in the operation of air- craft in Arctic zones and at great altitudes.The fuel taken from the Heinkel's tanks proved to be "87 octane," and it is believed that one of Germany's main reasons in employing direct in- jection has been the possibility of using low-grade fuel. Nowadays, for high-performance aircraft, fuel of , "100 octane" is used.
APPEARANCE
The limits to which gasoline injection pump components have to be manufactured are very fine, and it is estimated that the Heinkel's outfit cost not less than £400 to produce. Against this may be set the fact that periods between overhaul are lengthened, al- though surfacing work can be carried out only by specially trained mechanics.

lt is stated that the internal finish or the engine in the shot-down plane is of high order, but the external appearance and detail work do not ap- proach the standard of British planes.

Sunday Times (Perth, WA) Sunday 7 July 1940.

Where Hurricanes Score!
...When Hurricanes return from a patrol special refuelling lorries attend to several machines simultaneously.
These pump in petrol of 100-octane capacity...

Sunday Times (Perth, WA) Sunday 1 September 1940

SPITFIRES FASTEST FIGHTERS.
...It is now possible to reveal one step which has been taken to increase the efficiency of British fighters, namely, the employment of
"100 octane fuel." which, with specially built engines, is able to increase speeds up to 30 miles an hour. Spitfires, using this fuel, are unquestionably still the fastest fighters actually serving un any air force...

The Sydney Morning Herald (NSW) 2 April 1940

Sir Hugh Tett
Sir Hugh Tett, former chairman and managing director of Esso Petroleum, was born on December 28, 1906. He died on January 2 aged 94.
Oil executive who pioneered leaded petrol and concocted the high-octane fuel that made the Spitfire outperform the Messerschmitt
Research by Hugh Tett at the beginning of the Second World War helped the RAF to win the Battle of Britain. Taking over from a colleague who had been called up, he developed a 100-octane fuel for fighter aircraft such as the Hurricane and Spitfire which helped them to outperform the Messerschmitt. He then had the job of persuading the Americans to produce it for beleaguered Britain, as the RAF braced itself to face the Luftwaffe...

The Times (London) January 31, 2001


Higher Performance by Fighters
Change in Fuel
From our aeronautical correspondent


It is now permissible to describe some of the steps that have been taken since the outbreak of war to increase the efficiency of British interceptor fighting aeroplanes.
One measure of importance is the increased aircraft performance secured by the employment of 100 octane fuell. This has long been known to those in touch with the Service, but up to now it has been thought inadvisable that it should be publicly discussed.
The use of 100 octane fuel was always visualized in peace. It allows higher boost pressures to be used with out damage to the engine. Although to obtain the full benefit th engine must be built to use it, it does in practice give an improved performance in speed and climb when used for engines normally taking 87 octane fuel. The speed increase may be anything from five to 20 miles an hour.

It will be recalled that Sir Kingsley Wood, in his speech on the Air Estimates in the House of Commons, said that the Spitfire had undergone a "further"speed increase of 10 per cent. Its previous official speed figures was 367. miles an hour, though whether the Minister meant a 10 per cent increase on that is not quite clear. At any rate, it is positive that the Spitfire, with the aid of 100 octane and some minor improvements, Is still holding its position as the fastest standard fighting aeroplane in any air service

The Times (London, England), Monday, Apr 01, 1940; pg. 5; Issue 48578.

Last edited by Seadog; 06-06-2012 at 06:49 AM.
  #8  
Old 06-06-2012, 07:00 AM
Seadog Seadog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seadog View Post
Yet another RAF force multiplier was high-octane fuel. When the war began, both the Luftwaffe and the RAF were using 87 octane aviation fuel. Beginning in May 1940, the RAF obtained 100 octane fuel from the United States and used it throughout the battle. It boosted the performance of the Merlin engines in the Hurricanes and Spitfires from 1,000 to about 1,300 horsepower.
http://www.airforce-magazine.com/Mag...808battle.aspx


By the summer of 1940,
modiications had improved the
performance of the Spitire and
Hurricane. The Spitire’s original
two-blade wooden propeller was
replaced, irst by variable pitch
three-blade units, and then by a
constant-speed unit. This signiicantly
improved take-of performance and the
vital rate of climb. From May 1940 the
use of 100-octane fuel, as used in the
1931 Schneider Trophy races, increased
the Merlin’s performance from 1,000 to
some 1,300hp.
p77

70th Anniversary of the Battle of Britain
Published in association with Royal Air Force Media and
Communications, Headquarters Air Command
www.raf.mod.uk


The most dramatic benefit of the earliest Houdry units was in the production of 100-octane aviation gasoline, just before the outbreak of World War II. The Houdry plants provided a better gasoline for blending with scarce high-octane components, as well as by-products that could be converted by other processes to make more high-octane fractions. The increased performance meant that Allied planes were better than Axis planes by a factor of 15 percent to 30 percent in engine power for take-off and climbing; 25 percent in payload; 10 percent in maximum speed; and 12 percent in operational altitude. In the first six months of 1940, at the time of the Battle of Britain, 1.1 million barrels per month of 100-octane aviation gasoline was shipped to the Allies. Houdry plants produced 90 percent of this catalytically cracked gasoline during the first two years of the war.
http://www.nacatsoc.org/history.asp?HistoryID=30



That process would make a crucial difference in mid-1940, when the Royal Air Force started filling its Spitfires and Hurricanes with 100-octane gasoline imported from the United States instead of the 87 octane it had formerly used. Luftwaffe pilots couldn't believe they were facing the same planes they had fought successfully over France a few months before. The planes were the same, but the fuel wasn't. In his 1943 book The Amazing Petroleum Industry, V. A. Kalichevsky of the Socony-Vacuum Oil Company explained what high-octane gasoline meant to Britain: "It is an established fact that a difference of only 13 points in octane number made possible the defeat of the Luftwaffe by the R.A.F. in the fall of 1940. This difference, slight as it seems, is sufficient to give a plane the vital `edge' in altitude, rate of climb and maneuverability that spells the difference between defeat and victory."
http://www.mindfully.org/Technology/...tane1oct04.htm

The second was the lack of suitable
engines to power a heavy bomber. The
"difficulties experienced by German engine
manufacturers in producing engines that met
comparable performance standards of
American and British industry," limited the
design and performance of their aircraft.38
This was partly due to the late start German
engineers had in designing high-performance
engine types and partly due to the low octane
fuels on hand to operate them. The Germans
entered the war using 87–89 octane fuels.
This octane rating, however, could only be
achieved "by adding 15–18 percent aromatics
with tetraethyl lead to the synthetic fuel."39
In contrast, during the Battle of Britain the
British used 100 octane fuels supplied by the
United States
.

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ww2/batlbrit.pdf

The plant at Heysham, together with those at Stanlow and Billingham produced iso-octane additives required to raise 87 octane fuel to 100 octane rating. Initially, the limited size of the 100 octane fuel stockpile required strict rationing until supplies could be increased to meet requirements and the 100 octane fuel was dyed green to distinguish it from the 87 octane fuel which was blue.
Bulk supply contracts for higher octane fuel were placed by the Air Ministry and it was put into widespread use in the RAF in March 1940 when Spitfires' Rolls Royce Merlin engines were converted to use the 100 octane fuel.

By May 1940, reconnaissance Spitfires had begun flying combat missions using the 100 octane fuel. By 31 July 1940, there were 384 Spitfires serving in 19 squadrons using the 100 octane fuel.

http://www.heyshamheritage.org.uk/html/trimpell.html

February 16
All the Squadron aircraft [Hurricane 151 squadron] had been modified to enable them to operate on 100 Octane fuel. This gave the capability of operation at +12 boost to meet operational emergencies without damage to the engines.

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/kelsey.family/1940.htm

The Allies have an important advan-
tage over Germany because of their un-
limited access to the highest-grade
aviation fuels.
"Petroleum Press Service," official Journal
of the British oil industry, states that, until
recently, the fuel most widely used, both by
civil and military aircraft, had an octane (or
measure of anti-knock value) rating of around
87, but that there Is now a rapidly growing
tendency to use 100 octane spirit. This enables
the compression ratio of an engine to be
Increased, and, therefore, raises the power.
Spirit of an octane rating of 87 generally
is obtained by the addition of small quantities
of tetra-ethyl lead to good-quality "straight
run" petrol. Germany, it is thought, Is un-
likely to suffer from a shortage of this grade
of fuel.
But if, as Is probable, the Allies eventually
resort to the almost exclusive use of 100
octane fuel, Germany's problem will be more
difficult, for there are definite technical limits
to the use of lead 'c'opa," the only practicable
way of producing 100 octane spirit being to
employ high-qualitv blending agente, such as
"mixed octanes."

Seven or eight plants for the manufacture ol
this vital blending material, with an aggregate
capacity of about 100,000 tons a year, are now in
operation or under construction In Germany.
This quantity would be sufficient for the pro-
duction of about 220,000 tons of 100 octane
aviation petrol-a total which might possibly
be raised to 400,000 tons by the end of 1941
if adequate quantities of other high-octane
blending agents could be spared for the
purpose.
In view of the heavy military consumption
of aircraft fuel by Germanv, however, and
because the total supply of petrol is limited
and big hydrogénation plants are vulnerable
to air attack, her prospects would not appear
to be enviable on the basis of existing
knowledge

The Sydney Morning Herald, April 3 1940

Secrets of the Heinkel
(By Air Mail)
LONDON.
ALTHOUGH the Heinkel III,

which had a "happy landing" to the west of the Maginot Line, after its personnel had found safety in parachutes, revealed no secrets of German aircraft-most of the apparatus had been thrown out by the parachutes-a similar plane shot down later in Scotland proved a veritable mine for the R.A.F. experts.

It is revealed that the Germans use a feed pump regulating the flow through injectors of tiny particles of gasoline direct into each cylinder. The gas ls injected in a fanwise spray and comes into contact with supercharged air heated under pressure.

One advantage is the elimination of freezing which is prolific of air accidents. This is especially important in the operation of air- craft in Arctic zones and at great altitudes.The fuel taken from the Heinkel's tanks proved to be "87 octane," and it is believed that one of Germany's main reasons in employing direct in- jection has been the possibility of using low-grade fuel. Nowadays, for high-performance aircraft, fuel of , "100 octane" is used.
APPEARANCE
The limits to which gasoline injection pump components have to be manufactured are very fine, and it is estimated that the Heinkel's outfit cost not less than £400 to produce. Against this may be set the fact that periods between overhaul are lengthened, al- though surfacing work can be carried out only by specially trained mechanics.

lt is stated that the internal finish or the engine in the shot-down plane is of high order, but the external appearance and detail work do not approach the standard of British planes.

Sunday Times (Perth, WA) Sunday 7 July 1940.

Where Hurricanes Score!
...When Hurricanes return from a patrol special refuelling lorries attend to several machines simultaneously.
These pump in petrol of 100-octane capacity...

Sunday Times (Perth, WA) Sunday 1 September 1940

SPITFIRES FASTEST FIGHTERS.
...It is now possible to reveal one step which has been taken to increase the efficiency of British fighters, namely, the employment of
"100 octane fuel." which, with specially built engines, is able to increase speeds up to 30 miles an hour. Spitfires, using this fuel, are unquestionably still the fastest fighters actually serving in any air force...

The Sydney Morning Herald (NSW) 2 April 1940

Sir Hugh Tett
Sir Hugh Tett, former chairman and managing director of Esso Petroleum, was born on December 28, 1906. He died on January 2 aged 94.
Oil executive who pioneered leaded petrol and concocted the high-octane fuel that made the Spitfire outperform the Messerschmitt
Research by Hugh Tett at the beginning of the Second World War helped the RAF to win the Battle of Britain. Taking over from a colleague who had been called up, he developed a 100-octane fuel for fighter aircraft such as the Hurricane and Spitfire which helped them to outperform the Messerschmitt. He then had the job of persuading the Americans to produce it for beleaguered Britain, as the RAF braced itself to face the Luftwaffe...

The Times (London) January 31, 2001


Higher Performance by Fighters
Change in Fuel
From our aeronautical correspondent


It is now permissible to describe some of the steps that have been taken since the outbreak of war to increase the efficiency of British interceptor fighting aeroplanes.
One measure of importance is the increased aircraft performance secured by the employment of 100 octane fuell. This has long been known to those in touch with the Service, but up to now it has been thought inadvisable that it should be publicly discussed.
The use of 100 octane fuel was always visualized in peace. It allows higher boost pressures to be used with out damage to the engine. Although to obtain the full benefit the engine must be built to use it, it does in practice give an improved performance in speed and climb when used for engines normally taking 87 octane fuel. The speed increase may be anything from five to 20 miles an hour.

It will be recalled that Sir Kingsley Wood, in his speech on the Air Estimates in the House of Commons, said that the Spitfire had undergone a "further"speed increase of 10 per cent. Its previous official speed figures was 367. miles an hour, though whether the Minister meant a 10 per cent increase on that is not quite clear. At any rate, it is positive that the Spitfire, with the aid of 100 octane and some minor improvements, Is still holding its position as the fastest standard fighting aeroplane in any air service

The Times (London, England), Monday, Apr 01, 1940; pg. 5; Issue 48578.
It seems that even in April 1940 every schoolboy from Britain to Australia knew that RAF FC was using 100 octane fuel...it was no secret and was widely reported in the press.
  #9  
Old 06-06-2012, 08:36 AM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seadog View Post
........By May 1940, reconnaissance Spitfires had begun flying combat missions using the 100 octane fuel. By 31 July 1940, there were 384 Spitfires serving in 19 squadrons using the 100 octane fuel.
http://www.heyshamheritage.org.uk/html/trimpell.html.........
That says that the Spitfire conversion was done at 31st july,

The start of the BoB was at the 10th of July (Channel Battles) with the preparations for Seeloewe by decimating the fighter force.

British historians see a different beginning date in august with the beginning of large day bombing raids.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
  #10  
Old 06-04-2012, 11:42 PM
Glider Glider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
Agree. In addition the papers David showed specifically mention that ca. 3-4 Bomber Command stations were only to be supplied with 100 octane fuel.

So I guess the million dollar question is who (BC Stations, FC Stations, manufacturers etc.) used and what amount of the fuel, and in what role (operational/non-operational flights, test trials).
Why do you always ignore the other papers that show the rule of thumb was to have 5/6th of the fuel to be 100 octane and 1/6th 87 octane. You know that only 4 No 2 Grp stations were 100% equipped with 100 Octane.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.