Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 05-31-2012, 09:44 AM
tools4fools tools4fools is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: between Bangkok and Basel
Posts: 82
Default

Quote:
Where as you on the other hand have no proof let alone quotes to support your theories would be considered twisting and bending what was said.
How about this:
Quote:
And the high speed wind tunnel testing the Germans were working on was for planes flying faster than that.. Which is why they did not immediately make the connection that a swept wing is beneficial at sub sonic speeds.
Untrue as we have seen. As we see bend and twisted to fit your argument.

Quote:
But as we now know the wings were swept to correct the cg and not to take advantage of swept wing theory/technology
Untrue!
You are twisting things once more - only the outer wing section was initially swept for COG reasons.

Quote:
You will be hard pressed to see any aspects of the Me 262 designs being used in post war FIGHTERS.
Where you had to add 'unique' later on. So bend and twisted from 'any' to 'any unique' - which has a completely different meaning.

Quote:
In that it was all done before by Robert Goddard
Your claim on the first ballistic missile. As we all know his rockets never got beyond the experimental point.
The claim that Goddard had "done it all before" is simply untrue.
Another prime example where you bend and twist history to fit your agenda.

And there was the issue where you claimed the Allieds didn't bother with rockets and the V2 as it was not worth - yet they were keen on capturing the design team and send over 600 bombers.

The problem is again and again you pick selected quotes that fit your believe,create a few more myths along the way and bend and twist some sources that they fit your agenda, and ignore anything that doesn't fit your agenda.

Result is a completely distorted and one sided point of view, about as bad as history channel.
++++
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.