Iron Front: Liberation 1944 - Release date announced

[bw_wolverine]

Originally Posted by Ploughman

Lack of spotted camo and an incomplete set of AFVs ruined the game for me too (wot? No Tiger!!). That aside I can't seem to get on line with it at the moment, but the off line stuff's fokkin' amazing. And I can't believe how well it runs on my old crate, it's quite simply awesome.

?

I'm confused. Is the game 'ruined' because it's missing a few specific items or is it 'fokkin' amazing'?

How can it be both?

Mamma mia. I begin to understand the woe of game developers trying to make people happy.

[JG27_brook]

Originally Posted by bw_wolverine

?

I'm confused. Is the game 'ruined' because it's missing a few specific items or is it 'fokkin' amazing'?

How can it be both?

Mamma mia. I begin to understand the woe of game developers trying to make people happy.

A saying in war "if u dont have air power ,u have tanks ,if u dont have tanks u have artillery"

if take any of these things out , you cant have real tactics in game play , so to tack out

german tank destroyers like jagdpanther and Panzerjaeger lV/70 that the germans used in defence and tanks for offence is taking out a whole part german tank tactics

[BadAim]

The only problem with that theory is that neither type was produced in significant enough numbers to effect anything, and all things being equal I'd rather have a good game without a few pieces of armor today than with everything that the Germans built in three years.

I mean, to each his own, If people would rather complain about what they don't have that be happy with what they do, then have at it. I'll be busy causing mayhem on the eastern front!

[Feathered_IV]

Originally Posted by bw_wolverine

?

I'm confused. Is the game 'ruined' because it's missing a few specific items or is it 'fokkin' amazing'?

How can it be both?

Mamma mia. I begin to understand the woe of game developers trying to make people happy.

Relax, is joke.

[JG27_brook]

And in 44 this add to the game http://youtu.be/xaPaq9UN8_I

[Nephris]

Well gentlemen before bothering about lacking vehicles in the game, remind the historical background it is founded at. The Baranov bridgehead introduced the first Tiger II to the eastfront. This means all vehicle took apart at this location in july 44 are in. No Nebelwerfer battery took apart in the battles around Baranov in july 44, same belongs to any SS units or Panzerjäger, which were send to the invasion front and the battlegrounds in southern ukraine.

I am more concerned about the low res textures introduced agian,after these were alread yeliminted in ArmAOA 1.6. This is what really spoils fun for me.

[jamesdietz]

...and it is beautiful...just downloaded it yesterday,has anyone else?
http://ironfront.deepsilver.com/en/
I'm having only one troble :Armory & Boot camp don't seem to work & I haven't a clue on how to navigate thru this great looking & running sim...help?!

[Zappatime]

Just started d/l now, but only on 2% Always liked ARMA 2, so looking forward to this.

[ElAurens]

Considering getting it myself.

I like ArmA II, so having that game engine with a WW2 skin should be even better.

[Thee_oddball]

Originally Posted by BadAim

The only problem with that theory is that neither type was produced in significant enough numbers to effect anything, and all things being equal I'd rather have a good game without a few pieces of armor today than with everything that the Germans built in three years.

I mean, to each his own, If people would rather complain about what they don't have that be happy with what they do, then have at it. I'll be busy causing mayhem on the eastern front!

not true badaim they were used at market garden effectively, however most of them were used on the eastern front but they were also massed for the ardennes offensive. although only 400+ were made they were able to destroy any allied vehicle.

what ever vehicles fought during the war in what ever amount would be nice for the mission makers to make as historically correct CO-OPs and campaigns as possible.