Friday Update, April 13, 2012

[king1hw]

Originally Posted by VO101_Tom

Write it down 100 times:
"i will read the whole thread before whining"

Now that is laughable your so bias to Blue it is sick.

Come up with something ELSE TOMMY.

[csThor]

Originally Posted by king1hw

Now that is laughable your so bias to Blue it is sick .

Oh, and you are absolutely neutral? If you managed to converse in a normal tone people may take you serious. But right now you merely resemble an angry little kid who hasn't gotten the sweets he wanted.

[Volksieg]

Bad! Naughty csThor! Fancy having a favourite side in a war simulator! Next time I suggest you play it safe and support the Swiss..... means you don't get to play but you can sit back and watch and keep all the cash.

[king1hw]

So your feeling about correct historical speed at sea level can be reproduced or even close? Please show me a video of a SpitfireMKIa doing this and I will go away at peace and fly them the best I can. Of course I like flying the allied planes for personal reasons and will defend the data that has been presented to this crew over the past 12 years being involved with the il2 series.

Why no 12lb spitfire when they were being flown in FRANCE. So the game would show exactly what happened in history rookie pilots shooting down vets in better machines. However you may say that is not the truth and they were so inferior that it took an act of GOD or a big bang to produce what it said in history.

For the Hurricane being at more bases it must have done well in the fight with rooks behind the flight stick. Must have been a better machine with 12lbs of BOOST instead of 9 and yes the game had a 12 lb hurry in it so all they need to do WAS JUST CALL IT A 12lb Hurricane MKIa not dumb it back to 9lbs and make it slower.

Its ok Thor I will still fly the sim just every time a patch comes out it dose not match the data and I will be on here questioning the history. Rooks vs Vets something to be said about the pilots and the machines they flew in.

king

[[URU]AkeR]

Sweeet!!!! GReat news from the patch! And the screenshots of the sequel look better and better every time.

Originally Posted by csThor

Oh, and you are absolutely neutral? If you managed to converse in a normal tone people may take you serious. But right now you merely resemble an angry little kid who hasn't gotten the sweets he wanted.

+1

[Jaws2002]

Originally Posted by king1hw

......some endless whining......

Could you please wait for the patch and whine after you actually tried it please?




May have to take more than one tho.

[CaptainDoggles]

I'm quite pleased with the news on the whole, but I just want to point something out that was disappointing to read.

Unfortunately some deeply-set limitations in the engine code do not allow us to minimize the margin of error at altitudes about 7 km (21,000 ft) where most aircraft begin to perform worse than their real-life counterparts. Fixing this requires more extensive code rework and will therefore only appear with the upcoming sequel.

Not long ago I posted that we could expect 1c not to fix things until after the sequel was out. Looks like I was at least partially correct.

I took a lot of abuse and ridicule from the moderators here and was given some ridiculous number of infraction points because I was "spreading deliberate falsehoods".

Feels good to be right in the face of jerks being wrong.