Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 01-03-2012, 08:50 AM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Yeah, the Flypast forum has some proper gems coming out every now and then

the pics are of a Buchon though, there are some structural differences, other than fwd of the firewall obviously, mainly in the dual spar structure, which makes for a slightly heavier but more robust wing.

I spent some fun times paint stripping the wings of a T-6, man what a PIA! The surface coat normally comes out easily, but the primers used are SO hard to remove sometimes!

As for the 109 size, it's an advantage also in terms of strategic production, since you need less material to produce one aircraft.

I still regard the 109 as the most overall efficient and cost effective fighter aircraft of WW2.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-03-2012, 10:45 AM
Pitti's Avatar
Pitti Pitti is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
As for the 109 size, it's an advantage also in terms of strategic production, since you need less material to produce one aircraft.

I still regard the 109 as the most overall efficient and cost effective fighter aircraft of WW2.
+1

And another reason for the size of the 109 (from the book "Spitfire vs Bf 109 - Battle of Britain" by Tony Holmes):
Quote:
Finally, the design had to be small enough to enable it to be transported by rail.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-03-2012, 11:39 AM
drewpee drewpee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 427
Default

That Bouchon is a real oddity. I'd like to know why they chose to mate the RR with the 109. Was cost the mane reason (maybe surplus engines/airframes)or was there some performance gain? I remember seeing a doco on the making of the film Battle Of Britten and they used AC from the Spanish AF in allot of their footage. I thought at the time the noses of the 109's were a bit odd.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-03-2012, 11:49 AM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drewpee View Post
That Bouchon is a real oddity. I'd like to know why they chose to mate the RR with the 109. Was cost the mane reason (maybe surplus engines/airframes)or was there some performance gain? I remember seeing a doco on the making of the film Battle Of Britten and they used AC from the Spanish AF in allot of their footage. I thought at the time the noses of the 109's were a bit odd.
How many D-B engines made since April 1945?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-03-2012, 11:56 AM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drewpee View Post
That Bouchon is a real oddity. I'd like to know why they chose to mate the RR with the 109. Was cost the mane reason (maybe surplus engines/airframes)or was there some performance gain? I remember seeing a doco on the making of the film Battle Of Britten and they used AC from the Spanish AF in allot of their footage. I thought at the time the noses of the 109's were a bit odd.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hispano...C3%B3n_HA-1112
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-03-2012, 12:41 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drewpee View Post
That Bouchon is a real oddity. I'd like to know why they chose to mate the RR with the 109. Was cost the mane reason (maybe surplus engines/airframes)or was there some performance gain? I remember seeing a doco on the making of the film Battle Of Britten and they used AC from the Spanish AF in allot of their footage. I thought at the time the noses of the 109's were a bit odd.
it's another classic example of when business gets in the way of aviation. I frankly find the nose section revolting to say the least.. nothing beats the sleek design of the DB engined 109s
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-03-2012, 01:53 PM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
it's another classic example of when business gets in the way of aviation. I frankly find the nose section revolting to say the least.. nothing beats the sleek design of the DB engined 109s
Interesting, i find it ungodly that anyone can strap something so beastly to a beautiful merlin.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-03-2012, 02:17 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fruitbat View Post
Interesting, i find it ungodly that anyone can strap something so beastly to a beautiful merlin.
lol fair enough

Re. the DB601/605/603 it really shows though how every detail was engineered for aeronautical performance and with quality in mind. The inverted V layout meant that mechanics could work on the cylinder heads without trestles: all the delicate parts of the engine (rockers, injectors) were below (which in dogfights is a clear advantage) and even if hit on the top it would mean that the oil bleeding from the engine would be considerably less than its counterpart, allowing it to survive a bit longer even if damaged. The exhaust stacks weren't in the way of the cockpit and were easily shielded by the top plates, and last but not least you could make good use of the space between the cylinder banks and put a nice big cannon in it.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-03-2012, 04:00 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Agh, the Hispano_Suiza was an upright V12 and had a cannon mounted in the V. The Russians put a 37mm in their version of this engine.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-03-2012, 05:50 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

the DB605 was still produced in Sweden after 1945. but they were very expensive to purchase. Switzerland as example decided to buy cheap used P-51 instead of swedish engines forvthei dozen Bf109G-6.........

and the first version of the spanish 109s had Hispano engines btw. I guess the Merlin gave a better performance
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.