Its almost free now..

[nearmiss]

Originally Posted by Tree_UK

Even at the prices advertised its still way to expensive, for a game that still as massive issues it should now be a give away product.

Tree you are still amazing... you persist to be the troll that pokes his head from under the bridge makes a stinky comment and crawls back under the bridge. LOL

You make me laugh often.

[KG26_Alpha]

Originally Posted by nearmiss

Tree you are still amazing... you persist to be the troll that pokes his head from under the bridge makes a stinky comment and crawls back under the bridge. LOL

You make me laugh often.

That seagull is under-modelled.

[Pudfark]

I've yet to see tree proved wrong....
There do seem to be a lot of tree baiting going on...
To include taunting and barking....and name calling...
If what I have stated above ain't accurate?
It's surely a nearmiss.

[ATAG_Bliss]

Originally Posted by Feathered_IV

I don't think it will ever really replicate the sort of numbers one saw in a typical BoB engagement. Blaming it on hardware limitations is a cop out too. It just requires a creative solution that the developers are incapable of producing.

It's already achieved the highest number of AI in a mission out of any flight sim ever made besides the original IL2 (If not go ahead and give me some proof) And considering the developers have already produced the longest lasting most popular WWII, IMO the best flight sim ever made, I think they're more than capable of doing just about anything.

Did you ever remember how buggy ROF was when it 1st came out? Heck, they still can't even fix the problem with their master browser, and it's pushing 3 years. The game engine for ROF is soo limited it's not even funny. I think I have more AAA at a single airfield in our mission than what's even possible for the total number of objects in a ROF mission before it crashes. IL2COD is straight up awesome. Just because everything doesn't work right atm, does not mean that it won't ever work right. The main thing, the game engine, has already proven it can do more than any other sim out there already and this is by a long shot. As a MP player, the only sim that even comes close to what you can do in IL2COD is the old IL2.

Please show me any flight sim that can even think about getting this many planes in the air.

Here's over 1000 planes: (yes it's slowed down for performance sake / record) Go ahead and show me 1/10th of those # of planes in a ROF video. Good luck getting the mission to even load!

Oh, and this was back in May.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xn1f7vnfxo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtQZTI-ft3o

Originally Posted by nearmiss

Tree you are still amazing... you persist to be the troll that pokes his head from under the bridge makes a stinky comment and crawls back under the bridge. LOL

You make me laugh often.

lol, come on Nearmiss you can do better than that, and surely you know by now that I never crawl back under the bridge Im more than happy to fight my corner.

Nice pic though I'll give you that.

[Trumper]

Well i bought it yesterday even though i know my computer isn't up to it.
Even with alot of the settings low, poodling about in a Tigermoth is lovely,well worth the price of a litre of fuel and a bar of chocolate.
Whether it should be called a combat sim or not is possibly a step too far but seems nice at the moment.

[tk471138]

Originally Posted by JG52Uther

Just Flight is fine, I used it a few times. If its cheaper, more people will buy it. What new game doesn't get cheaper?
On another note, RoF is free now...

yea new games get cheaper but not from 50-60$ to like 12$ in less than a year....usually most modern games wont reduce their price by even $10 untill after a year, or so...i wish with all games i can wait 7 or 8 months and be able to pay 15$ for the game...this is totally unprecedented, but you are trying to say that this is normal and everything is fine....

also RoF, has a different business model, and thus might be able to make profit based on the new planes and additions...

RoF also has a more supportive community and not a basher community for some reasons I do not know despite RoF's equally or more desastrous beginnings in comparison to CoD.

I guess as newcomers ppl were more forgiving towards the RoF devs. Some ppl changing from IL2 to Clod probably expected they will have something like the uber IL2 with great graphics, phantastic FM and DM and similar monster content, absolutely bug-free and running on a computer two years old with high settings. They got angry when their expectations hit reality ...

[Flanker35M]

S!

Stormcrow, there is truth in your statement We were told to expect something better and above IL-2. And there was no doubt because we knew the dev team had already several years of experience from IL-2 and would use lessons learned to create something even better. But something happened along the way and we got CoD at it's current state. So for sure there were may upset fans because of this.

Only thing we can wish is that Luthier and his team can pull together CoD and with it's sequels/add-ons bring up to the place it was planned to be, the new benchmark in WW2 flight sims.

[PLebre]

Hi,

When they can fix the laggy moving model part, they will have a working Great Sim.

Anyway CoD is full a great things, and can by most immersive, and I believe that Devs are working hard to correct it.

For 12€ think it is a good buy.

P.S.

Didn't fly CoD for some time, and the other day (after the last patch) I did a go on multiplayer. Always CTD, please correct it ASP.

Regards