![]() |
|
|||||||
| Vehicle and Terrain threads Discussions about environment and vehicles in CoD |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
All altimeters are calibrated through the pressure setting... so yes they do have a scale... but I've noted that to adjust them to read zero on the airfield the pressure setting has to be down around the 980mb level and doesn't change much. If your flying around in real airspace its important that in order to ensure safe vertical navigation the other people around you have their altimeters calibrated the same as you, i.e. they are using the same pressure setting. Generally, around an airfield you would be provided with a QFE pressure setting. Putting this into you altimeter would mean that it would read zero when your on the airfield. When you leave the airfield airspace you generally change the pressure setting to QNH. This would be given to you over the radio and would mean that your altimeter would read the altitude above mean sea level. As pressure is a variable, QNH pressures differ by regions. Finally, when flying above what is known as the transition layer the altimeter pressure would be set to 1013mb - and your height is translated as a Flight Level. Point I was trying (but failed) to make was that there are no pressure settings given over the comms so to me it seems somewhat irrelivant at the moment to start adjusting the altimeter scale. Thinking it through... there could be some testing done here to deterime at what heights the radar reports bandits are at and then adjusting the sub-scale to see if it using Flight Levels?
__________________
Intel® Core™ i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz ASUS P8P67 Rev3 EVGA 1280MB GeForce GTX 570 HD Superclocked 8 GB DDR3-1600-Corsair Vengeance 750W Corsair Enthusiast 750TXV2UK PSU Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64 bit Microsoft Sidewinder 2 FFB and NaturalPoint TrackIR3 |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
@Bonkin & @cheesehawk
Thanks for the clarification. Varrattu
__________________
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit Intel Core i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz 2x4gb DDR3-1600 GeForce GTX 970 4095 MB Logitech G35 Headset Logitech G940 Flight System (fw 1.42) Mad Catz Strike7 Keyboard Headtracker DIY 6DOF & OpenTrack 2.3.10 |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't know the answer to this - but again, for safe vertical navigation for aircraft in the circuit I suspect they did. The control towers were there for that very reason - control. In the real world when joining an airfield control area you are given the QFE, runway in use and wind. I don't imagine it was any different back then.
__________________
Intel® Core™ i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz ASUS P8P67 Rev3 EVGA 1280MB GeForce GTX 570 HD Superclocked 8 GB DDR3-1600-Corsair Vengeance 750W Corsair Enthusiast 750TXV2UK PSU Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64 bit Microsoft Sidewinder 2 FFB and NaturalPoint TrackIR3 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
The best guess we (of the virtual 322) could make about the altimeter is (currently) that the altimeter would be setup above sea. Sealevel plus approx 100ft. Sadly setting up the altimeter could be the cause of some crews to crash doing it.
__________________
Q9550 @ 3.4 Coolermaster 850w PSu Sapphire HD6970 2GB 8Gb Ram B.Dragon Kingston SSD Win 7 64 Logitech G940 Saitek Quadrant |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
For every flight / take off the REICHSWETTERDIENST prepared a weather forecast for start location and destination. Also included was the QFE for departure aerodrome and destination aerodrome. For this they used the form --Vordruck RWD F2--.
Source: Der Flugbetrieb der Luftwaffe, L.Dv.5/1Regards Varrattu
__________________
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit Intel Core i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz 2x4gb DDR3-1600 GeForce GTX 970 4095 MB Logitech G35 Headset Logitech G940 Flight System (fw 1.42) Mad Catz Strike7 Keyboard Headtracker DIY 6DOF & OpenTrack 2.3.10 Last edited by Varrattu; 10-28-2011 at 06:03 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Interesting test.
__________________
Q9550 @ 3.4 Coolermaster 850w PSu Sapphire HD6970 2GB 8Gb Ram B.Dragon Kingston SSD Win 7 64 Logitech G940 Saitek Quadrant |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
When the dynamic weather is fully integrated I'm looking forward to seeing where it takes us. I like to fly full real and am hoping that we'll have to take account of pressure settings for navigation and finding the enemy. I also imagine that knowing the height of an aerodrome above sea level might be useful for high level bombing - but currently that's a whole part of the game I've yet to look into.
__________________
Intel® Core™ i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz ASUS P8P67 Rev3 EVGA 1280MB GeForce GTX 570 HD Superclocked 8 GB DDR3-1600-Corsair Vengeance 750W Corsair Enthusiast 750TXV2UK PSU Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64 bit Microsoft Sidewinder 2 FFB and NaturalPoint TrackIR3 |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
No Gravesend in the list?
Still, I understand it's too risky to bomb, what with No.501 County of Gloucester being stationed there |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here you go in attached zip a PDF Gravesend included. Revised Formating as well.
It would also seem that the QNH varies with the time of day. Thats what I am seeing on the ATAG server anyway. Last edited by IvanK; 10-31-2011 at 06:27 AM. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Chaps
I have gone a bit further with my Enroute Supplement. 616Sqn now has a Flight Planning Office: 616Sqn Flight Planning Office There is a fair amount of useful information in the website as well. Its still not quiet fininshed and there are a few more runways to enter etc... The lower charts are clickable for printing too. Gosling Lt RNVR 616Sqn |
![]() |
|
|