![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
With the version 1.01.14588, I would like to know if the night rendering has been modified or not ? It's seems to be less dark than before the patch... before the patch 1.01.14588 : ![]() after the patch 1.01.14588: ![]() Last edited by Mikmak; 07-17-2011 at 07:18 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah I noticed this too, looks really bad. I noticed that there was a full moon out when the bright landscape and cockpit showed up though I dont know if this has anything to do with it. No matter, even with a full moon up it is still far too bright at night now.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
s**t i only flew nighttime couple days ago and saw like the second SC, never even knew that it was like the first (as it's more supposed to be i think)
1C add it to the "put it back as it was" please (as you did when the water splashes had disappeared) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When your eyes are accustomed to low light, a full moon can be very bright, and it looks like a full moon is lighting the cockpit...I'm not saying it can't be made better, but to me it looks like a full moon...
__________________
EVGA X58 FTW3 motherboard Intel 980X CPU, not OC'd yet, 3.46 Mhz Crucial Tracer memory 8-8-8-24 12GB Crucial M4 256GB SSD, WD Raptor 600 GB hard disk EVGA GTX580 graphics card HP ZR24W Monitor 1900 X 1200 24" Thrustmaster Warthog joystick Saitek Combat rudder pedals TrackIr 5 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The first one looks like a pilot who just previously looked into a flashlight during a moonless night. The second one looks like a pilot who's eyes have adjusted to the darkness during a night when the moon is visible. Please post external views to show the outside of the plane and the state of the moon and sky, or these screen-caps have little weight as to whether or not it's correctly rendering the appropriate lighting.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1
__________________
EVGA X58 FTW3 motherboard Intel 980X CPU, not OC'd yet, 3.46 Mhz Crucial Tracer memory 8-8-8-24 12GB Crucial M4 256GB SSD, WD Raptor 600 GB hard disk EVGA GTX580 graphics card HP ZR24W Monitor 1900 X 1200 24" Thrustmaster Warthog joystick Saitek Combat rudder pedals TrackIr 5 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Seems ok to me. Few shots:
Moon behind: ![]() again: ![]() moon in front: ![]() and same from outside: ![]() ![]()
__________________
Asus P8P67-M Core I7 2600k Asus HD6970 2GB G-DDR 5 8GB 1600mhz DDR 3 Win7 Pro64 Ms FFB 2 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Moon at right side:
![]() and some weird UFO:s ![]() ![]()
__________________
Asus P8P67-M Core I7 2600k Asus HD6970 2GB G-DDR 5 8GB 1600mhz DDR 3 Win7 Pro64 Ms FFB 2 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Funny how a seemingly easily solved point always ends up being debated on these forums.
I have flown many hours at night with varying degrees of moonlight in light aircraft and airliners (although not much ambient light gets into them due to the pretty small windscreens re cockpit lighting) and the current night light seems far too bright, moonlight or not. Night is dark. This sounds blindingly (pardon the pun) obvious, but sims like DCS A10 get it right, ie on a moonless night you can't see a thing if there aren't lights on the ground. It's like flying in an inkwell. I flew with a full moon just the other night, and while it does light up things very well, it doesn't give perfect vision, although you could fly without lights very easily (you'd have to be pretty lucky to land however IMHO). Still, one shouldn't be able to see individual trees many kilometers away, as is now the case as demonstrated by these shots, or the instrument panel with perfect clarity. When practicing electrical failure in light aircraft, moonlight was not sufficient to see all instruments with any degree of accuracy, although a Cherokee doesn't have a transparent roof! Also, the colour is totally wrong - moonlight tends to wash out all colours, ending up with a kind of black and white effect. It's a totally artificial look at present - pre patch gets my vote, for what it's worth. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
|
|