Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2011, 12:00 PM
HFC_Dolphin HFC_Dolphin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvrdi View Post
wake up princess, average salary in croatia is around 680 €, with growing unemployment rate (we are the worst in this part of teh world now), with loans for flats ("given" from greedy foreign banks), all the expenses, 1L of gasoline costs 1.4 euros, you are left with almost nothing....and I have to pay full price not like in russia for cheaper...
SO YEAH 40€ is a luxury here...yep, it is a big deal mate....
I've been telling this to many people: I know a lot of people who were huge fans of IL2 and just can't follow in Clod.
Their systems, though they can play decently IL-2, they can't even load Clod and this is pitty, cause some of them were among the best guys of the community.

It's really sad that this game will leave a quite big part of the community behind, only because of its performance and the costs involved...

PS. I spent 1.060 euros for a brand new tower, only to hear from some people that my performance problems are because of my system!!!
OK, next time I'll robe a bank in order to play this game...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-21-2011, 12:29 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
There is no reason you should be constantly banging your head against the wall screaming that this won`t be as good as the IL2 Sturmovik. Luthier has been behind things AFAIK since Aces Expansion Pack so he qualifies as "the driving force". If you negate the potential of this title being any good in the future, just leave. Simple. You aren`t changing anyone`s opinion anyway.
Didn't Oleg have to bail Luthier/Ilya when he was developing Pacific Fighters?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-21-2011, 07:08 PM
Blue Scorpion Blue Scorpion is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 50
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
Oleg is gone........ so?



There is no reason you should be constantly banging your head against the wall screaming that this won`t be as good as the IL2 Sturmovik. Luthier has been behind things AFAIK since Aces Expansion Pack so he qualifies as "the driving force". If you negate the potential of this title being any good in the future, just leave. Simple. You aren`t changing anyone`s opinion anyway.



As of TODAY, I have spent a total of 40€ to play this game. That is all I payed for giving those folks some slack. Payed for their jobs and payed them to work in the future. Now those who have stayed with IL2 since 2001 have every right and proof to say that the game will be great, in some time. Meanwhile, those complaining are doing just that - complaining. You must be quite a sad person to get a spazmatic cry over 40€.



Constructive criticism is always welcome. Your post is just another example of a person who needs to get a life, because obviously he doesn`t have anything else to do in his sad existance other than to sit in front of a pc.
I understand your life is shaterred.
My comment about Oleg was in response to a post, which I quoted directly, that Oleg was still behind this game, he is not; it was a simple statement of fact, so what is your point in bringing it up?

Now, show me your copy of the guarantee this will have support and be fixed in 2 years time, no? Did not think so, anything else is pure conjecture and blowing smoke out of your ass, I too want to see it fixed, but wanting and getting are entirely different. For what it's worth, I have been with the series since the very start and own every iteration and add-on, but that does not mean shit, and it most certainly does not grant special insight into this titles future, to assume it does is idiocy.

/quote " because obviously he doesn`t have anything else to do in his sad existence other than to sit in front of a pc". So just what were you doing while posting here, I seriously doubt you were using ESP to scour the internet; seems to me like a classic case of transference, you should deal with that, it is clearly something that bothers you.

Have a good day… Oh before I forget; its, "paid", "existence" and "shattered", may help to check before you post in future, lest you be taken for a moron.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-21-2011, 02:38 PM
Zoom2136 Zoom2136 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 224
Default

........
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-22-2011, 03:09 AM
Theshark888 Theshark888 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoom2136 View Post
We all know that Oleg as a veru good reputation. He will deliver.
Oleg is gone and has been for a while, which may be the whole problem.
Luthier messed up PF and CoD is strike 2.

Last edited by Theshark888; 04-22-2011 at 03:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-21-2011, 03:56 AM
mungee's Avatar
mungee mungee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Durban, South Africa
Posts: 146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chivas View Post
The publishers and developers arn't stupid people and would not have released COD in the state it was in unless it was abolutely necessary. They new full well the respose would initially be bad. Now hopefully enough funds have been raised to secure further work on the series. This is actually a good thing for us, we may initially get a faulty product, but we now could have a product that will be continually added too and improved upon, instead of a development company that shuts down before the game is released.

Complainers that do so in a constructive manor are a great asset to the community, but there are more than a few that drive away new customers of the genre, which we all could ill afford. The only positive thing they do is provide entertainment, and keep the forums lively, while we still have a genre to participate in.
I agree 100% with Chivas' comments. I think that this sim has ENORMOUS potential and, for all of our sakes, it must be supported and the developers/publishers must be ENCOURAGED to keep improving/refining it!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-21-2011, 01:03 AM
Zoom2136 Zoom2136 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snwkill View Post
Yea but at least if they didn't release it, they wouldn't have dragged their name in the dirt. I am not sure what the reasoning was, but they did it. And yes while complaining really doesn't matter we might as well just "STFU", and leave for the summer and hopefully by fall come back to something better, this is a community.

Everyone is here complaining because they care, because they want to love the game, I guarantee everyone in here complaining is an avid flight sim fan, and wants this game to be the best thing for the next 8 years.

So unless the boards are taking away from the 1C company or causing some server to meltdown, you need the complainers, because from my stance the "complainers" are about 50% of the sales, and I don't see any new simmers jumping ship anytime soon.
LOL all will be forgotten in "2 weeks"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-21-2011, 06:47 AM
Ibis's Avatar
Ibis Ibis is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW Australia
Posts: 100
Default

"Everything seems new and not good enough to those too young to remember the old and too ignorant of Il2 history to have faith about it." – Not Thomas Sowell
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.