![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Everyone is here complaining because they care, because they want to love the game, I guarantee everyone in here complaining is an avid flight sim fan, and wants this game to be the best thing for the next 8 years. So unless the boards are taking away from the 1C company or causing some server to meltdown, you need the complainers, because from my stance the "complainers" are about 50% of the sales, and I don't see any new simmers jumping ship anytime soon. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I got my first online kill last night. It was the single imost immersive gaming experience i have ever had, bar none.
Not only was I struggling to come up to speed if engine temperature effects and the additional work load just in flying the plane that that entails, but trying to identify the tagets against ground clutter and then get into a firing solution without loosing track of the target. (Who helped me in the last moments by flying past my sights! I think he was concentrating on something else) CoD has it's problems, but no more that DCS:A-10 and ROF when they were initialy let loose on the world. Cheers |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I think this is a point worth of noting, cause both A10 and CoD are extremely accurate and demanding simulators aimed for specific and limited market. There is also the right way to do these things, and by far the way Eagle Dynamics chose was better. Of course in the ideal world games and sims alike would get published as a totally finished products, with no need for patching whatsoever. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yet it's still too rough, but it will we the best by far, people just can't wait
Last edited by jibo; 04-21-2011 at 04:32 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah I have to agree with a lot of the comments.
It's really a Beta so suck it up and wait for new patches. I certainly hope they get enough to make it viable or we are looking at a dead product. You can't sell this to new folks and expect them to stick with it. It reminds me of DCS A10. Bought the prebeta with all the bugs and performance issues knowing it would become something really good. So far so good. I really do hope this works out. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Complainers that do so in a constructive manor are a great asset to the community, but there are more than a few that drive away new customers of the genre, which we all could ill afford. The only positive thing they do is provide entertainment, and keep the forums lively, while we still have a genre to participate in.
__________________
Intel core I7 950 @ 3.8 Asus PT6 Motherboard 6 gigs OCZ DDR3 1600 Asus GTX580 Direct CU II 60gigSSD with only Windows7 64bit, Hotas Peripherals, and COD running on it 500gig HD Dual Boot Samsung 32"LG 120hz MSFF2 Joystick Cougar Throttle Saitek Pro Rudder pedals Voice Activation Controls Track IR 5 ProClip |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
As Chivas said constructive critisim is a great thing, just pilling in the negative comments helps nothing. We all know that Oleg as a veru good reputation. He will deliver. They propbably just needed the cash to do so. I really hope that the new addons (maps/plane/ships/ground object pack) are made available for a price, not givenaway for free. IMHO it is a small price to pay to assure the continuity of this genre. I know I would pay $30-$50 US for an expension pack. This way maybe we will have drivable tanks, ships, subs, etc... This would be the BOMB ![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|