Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2011, 09:00 PM
stm_God stm_God is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6
Default More realism in plane models

Hi I Posted this in the ubisoft forum as well.

First of all: Great Sim!

Second: I hate Steam. I have always hated it only slows games down.

Then to my point:
I have been playing now for a week and being a WW2 aviation enthusiast, find it a bit dissapointing that the 109 E cockpit, does not resemble the original in the views to the front sides or back, The cockpit had sharp edges not rounded corners at the top window, the armor plate behind the pilot is missing and so on. I'd like to know what prompted the makers to make such an inaccurate model after trying to do everything so HiFi otherwise?
The sound of the Daimler engine sounds more like my mothers sowing machine that a supercharged Messerschmidt.
I appreciate that the slight engine loss of power when dipping the nose with the Rolls Royce Merlin has been included.
But why not make the Emil what it should be? It was the coolest plane ever...

But again great sim guys. it just seems that someone has forced the watering down of the models.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-13-2011, 09:03 PM
Strike Strike is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 684
Default

About the E3 and canopy, have you seen the real E3? The E4 has the sharp edges you describe Nothing unrealistic there



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-14-2011, 04:47 PM
stm_God stm_God is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6
Default

Apparently the E3 came with two cockpits.
http://www.museumofflight.org/aircra...itt-bf-109e-3#
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3150/...1916bab146.jpg
http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/london/c...ge/bf109e4.jpg

That was what i based it on
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-14-2011, 04:58 PM
Strike Strike is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 684
Default

Well, I only know that a lot of the early E models had the rounded canopy. E-1 for instance too. But perhaps E-3's were modded with new canopies later on.

My immediate guess of the new canopy design was to improve visual conditions. The old (round) model seems to have a lot of bars running across the screen accompanied with smaller windows to peer through. The E-4 canopy may have been a result of pilots' complaints!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-14-2011, 05:16 PM
MD_Titus MD_Titus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 493
Default

you did notice that one of those jpgs is labelled E4 didn't you?
__________________
specs -
OS - Win7 64 bit
CPU - Intel Core2duo x6800 OC@3.2ghz
MOBO - MB-EVGA122CKNF68BR
RAM - ddr2 6gb @800mhz
GPU - nVidia geforce GTX 280 1gb
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-14-2011, 05:39 PM
Sven Sven is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Netherlands, Zeeland
Posts: 787
Default

The canopies were spread all over the place, E4's with early canopies E3's with late ones, it all occurred depending on availability and preference.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-14-2011, 06:40 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Just remember, every E3 equipped with MG-FF/M became automatically a E4!
Regardless of the canopy type.
The rounded canopy was replaced by the square for better pilot protection as they became available.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-14-2011, 07:51 PM
JG14_Jagr JG14_Jagr is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stm_God View Post
First of all: Great Sim!

Second: I hate Steam. I have always hated it only slows games down.

Then to my point:
I have been playing now for a week and being a WW2 aviation enthusiast, find it a bit dissapointing that the 109 E cockpit, does not resemble the original in the views to the front sides or back, The cockpit had sharp edges not rounded corners at the top window, the armor plate behind the pilot is missing and so on. I'd like to know what prompted the makers to make such an inaccurate model after trying to do everything so HiFi otherwise?
The sound of the Daimler engine sounds more like my mothers sowing machine that a supercharged Messerschmidt.
I appreciate that the slight engine loss of power when dipping the nose with the Rolls Royce Merlin has been included.
But why not make the Emil what it should be? It was the coolest plane ever...

But again great sim guys. it just seems that someone has forced the watering down of the models.
Also, I challenge you to show me an fps difference in any game running through STEAM and without it.. the system resources used on todays systems is so small that it is literally a non factor..

Ok, prepare to get lambasted.. just warning you up front. The 109E3 is modelled properly It did not have Pilot armor and the forward windscreen had rounded top edges as modelled.. As for the engine sound, are you comparing it to what you hear OUTSIDE the aircraft or what the pilot hears?
__________________
MSI P67A-65D
Intel i5 2500K @ 4.2 Gig
8 Gigs Corsair DDR3 1600 RAM
XFX 6970 Video Card
Win7 64 Bit Home Ed
ATI 12.3 Driver Package
WD Caviar 7600 RPM HDD
ATI CCC at DEFAULT settings
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-14-2011, 07:59 PM
JG14_Jagr JG14_Jagr is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 433
Default

Its important to understand what happens when a plane goes through a revision. Some things are modded in the field by the ground crews and the aircraft is brought up to the next level standard. Some changes require more significant work that can be done effectively in the field while still doing the maintenance needed to keep things flying. Often those planes would be rotated back while either new production AC or already retrofitted aircraft would be issued. If an airframe was still useful it would be upgraded until lost or damaged beyond repair. Many an Fw190A5 ended its life as an Fw190A8 after several upgrade cycles.

For an aircraft to be an Me109E3 and still exist today, it is likely it was lost or captured at a time that its upgrade cycle was frozen. It is unlikely that an E4 canopy would be put on an E3 since the parts would no longer be produced and the armored glass of later types was something the pilots wanted...same goes for the pilot armor. There are pictures online of AC that were built as E3's but they now appear to be E4's based on the added upgrades.. so technically you could call them E3's upgraded to E4 standards..
__________________
MSI P67A-65D
Intel i5 2500K @ 4.2 Gig
8 Gigs Corsair DDR3 1600 RAM
XFX 6970 Video Card
Win7 64 Bit Home Ed
ATI 12.3 Driver Package
WD Caviar 7600 RPM HDD
ATI CCC at DEFAULT settings
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.