![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Everything I have access to shows that across the extent of deployed Geshwader, both early in BoB and late in Bob E-1's - were minority - only assigned to some Enlisted pilots. Galland was in JG26 not 2. I think also that Galland, Wick, Balthasar and other 'Kannon' mainly had E-4/N's. Look at the Octane rating on their aircraft in profiles. The issues is a bit confused by E-1's/E-3's with E-4 canopy and E-3's which had ben upgraded to E-4 standard. BTW, my main JG26 source "JG26 Top Guns of the Luftwaffe - Donald Caldwell". S! Gunny Last edited by TUSA/TX-Gunslinger; 02-28-2011 at 11:11 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just for info:
The canopy style has NOTHING to do with E3 or E4!!!! The only difference between those models are the weapons in the wings!!!! E3 -> MG-FF E4 -> MG-FF/M So ANY E3 that received the weapon upgrade was automatically a E4. The squared canopy was refitted to all Emils when available, but some pilots wanted visibility more than protection.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() Last edited by robtek; 02-28-2011 at 11:42 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I only used the term E4 canopy for convieniance sake.
Any idea of a better term? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dunno, say rounded-frame and square-frame canopy I guess.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am in favor of as many early models as possible.
The "whinge and whine" factor of online hotrod jocks complaining about needing faster later machines means flightsims very rarely progress backwards in time. Hence the earlier the initial models in the sim are the better. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think you'll be pleasantly surprised once the third-party scene takes off for the new series.
BTW, I think one of the guys earlier in the thread had it nailed when he pointed out that give the screenshots we've seen of the armament screen and the info that many have given regarding the profusion of different variations of the cockpit/head armour styles among all three models, equipping any aircraft as an E-4 instead of an E-3 will likely be more of a case of choosing the belting. Admittedly that creates the "inaccuracy" of being able to fire older-type ammo with the newer MG FF/M, but given that on choosing the ammo you're semantically choosing the gun it's loaded into, and in terms of the damage model and aircraft weights there ought not to be a noticeable difference in the MG FF -> MG FF/M transition so I don't think it really matters. The real omission is the E-1. Last edited by TheGrunch; 03-01-2011 at 01:51 AM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks!
After thinking for a bit - either what you propose or perhaps "armored" or "unarmored"? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
EDIT: Seems i was a bit slow |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The RAF called them "squareheads" |
![]() |
|
|