Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-28-2011, 11:07 PM
TUSA/TX-Gunslinger's Avatar
TUSA/TX-Gunslinger TUSA/TX-Gunslinger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey View Post
You are wrong. Less than 30% were E4's by the time the BoB was ending.

JG2 had mostly E-1's throughout, only the likes of Galland had newer types.
And your sources? Please list. I'd like to know more.

Everything I have access to shows that across the extent of deployed Geshwader, both early in BoB and late in Bob E-1's - were minority - only assigned to some Enlisted pilots. Galland was in JG26 not 2.

I think also that Galland, Wick, Balthasar and other 'Kannon' mainly had E-4/N's. Look at the Octane rating on their aircraft in profiles. The issues is a bit confused by E-1's/E-3's with E-4 canopy and E-3's which had ben upgraded to E-4 standard.

BTW, my main JG26 source "JG26 Top Guns of the Luftwaffe - Donald Caldwell".

S!

Gunny

Last edited by TUSA/TX-Gunslinger; 02-28-2011 at 11:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2011, 11:39 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Just for info:

The canopy style has NOTHING to do with E3 or E4!!!!
The only difference between those models are the weapons in the wings!!!!
E3 -> MG-FF
E4 -> MG-FF/M

So ANY E3 that received the weapon upgrade was automatically a E4.
The squared canopy was refitted to all Emils when available, but some pilots wanted visibility more than protection.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects

Last edited by robtek; 02-28-2011 at 11:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-01-2011, 12:51 AM
TUSA/TX-Gunslinger's Avatar
TUSA/TX-Gunslinger TUSA/TX-Gunslinger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 195
Default

I only used the term E4 canopy for convieniance sake.

Any idea of a better term?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-01-2011, 12:54 AM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSA/TX-Gunslinger View Post
I only used the term E4 canopy for convieniance sake.

Any idea of a better term?
Dunno, say rounded-frame and square-frame canopy I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-01-2011, 01:22 AM
WTE_Galway WTE_Galway is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,207
Default

I am in favor of as many early models as possible.

The "whinge and whine" factor of online hotrod jocks complaining about needing faster later machines means flightsims very rarely progress backwards in time.

Hence the earlier the initial models in the sim are the better.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-01-2011, 01:39 AM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

I think you'll be pleasantly surprised once the third-party scene takes off for the new series. After all, we had plenty of early-war birds turn up after the initial release even for Il-2, the Gladiator, for example, even if it was created as an export version. Lots of guys from European countries other than England and Germany have an interest in the earlier types because they were the main types in use in their countries. The Buffalo for Finland, for example.

BTW, I think one of the guys earlier in the thread had it nailed when he pointed out that give the screenshots we've seen of the armament screen and the info that many have given regarding the profusion of different variations of the cockpit/head armour styles among all three models, equipping any aircraft as an E-4 instead of an E-3 will likely be more of a case of choosing the belting. Admittedly that creates the "inaccuracy" of being able to fire older-type ammo with the newer MG FF/M, but given that on choosing the ammo you're semantically choosing the gun it's loaded into, and in terms of the damage model and aircraft weights there ought not to be a noticeable difference in the MG FF -> MG FF/M transition so I don't think it really matters.

The real omission is the E-1.

Last edited by TheGrunch; 03-01-2011 at 01:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-01-2011, 01:46 AM
TUSA/TX-Gunslinger's Avatar
TUSA/TX-Gunslinger TUSA/TX-Gunslinger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrunch View Post
Dunno, say rounded-frame and square-frame canopy I guess.
Thanks!

After thinking for a bit - either what you propose or perhaps "armored" or "unarmored"?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2011, 01:54 AM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSA/TX-Gunslinger View Post
Thanks!

After thinking for a bit - either what you propose or perhaps "armored" or "unarmored"?
Haha, don't take me as any kind of definitive reference. It's not something that anyone's going to criticise you for if you don't use the most closely-translated name, though, I'm sure.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-01-2011, 03:07 AM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
No, the E4 is just a E3 where the MG-FF were replaced with MG-FF/M.
The canopy change was made around the same time to all emils for additional pilot protection.
If that's the only difference, then maybe we'll have it as an option in the arming options. The sim might still call it an E-3, but if i can go to the belting options and choose the m-shells for the cannons it's a good enough E-4 for me until they properly patch it in.


EDIT: Seems i was a bit slow

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks View Post
Maybe the mineshells are selectable as a belting option. I know, the name of the Bf 109 would not be historically 100% correct in this case.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-01-2011, 08:22 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSA/TX-Gunslinger View Post
I only used the term E4 canopy for convieniance sake.

Any idea of a better term?

The RAF called them "squareheads"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.