Head Tracking with Cliffs of Dover

[Wolf_Rider]

@ LoBi...
you're getting pretty hard up, when you have to quote yourself, LoBi... is this what you're going to do the next while? just quote yourself??

Originally Posted by David603

Understanding the law and opinion of what is right and wrong may differ. Can you honestly say your opinion of right and wrong and your understanding of the law are 100% compatible? If yes, you would find it impossible to live in the US, where each state has its own laws, or where I do in Scotland which has its own legal system separate from the rest of the UK.

furphy

Originally Posted by David603

Well, yes, part of my understanding of atheism is that there is no intrinsic right and wrong, so I would not hold up the conscience as being anything other than an indicator of contextually suitable behaviour. As such, if the conscience if not infallible, your conscience probably differs from mine, and if conscience is nothing more than a result of your culture and upbringing then there is no reason why it cannot be selectively examined.

And yes, I'm aware this could be used to justify to your conscience more or less anything, but my conscience is probably very close in values to for example a Christian's, barring of course that I don't believe in the Bible as the infallible word of God.

sorry, I don't do "god" conversations and as such, they have no place in this thread

Originally Posted by David603

However, we are going way off topic here, so lets drop the discussion of conscience and

nooo... you were going off topic

Originally Posted by David603

stick to discussing whether it is legal for FT to use the open version of the NP interface.

that would be nice, except, your "legal understandings" and your "conscience" would seem to preclude that... besides which, all the arguments are contained between posts 1 ~ current.