Head Tracking with Cliffs of Dover

Wolf_Rider · #1 02-26-2011, 12:06 PM

[QUOTE=David603;228643]

Well, okay, but that didn't answer my question

[/QUOTE

accept that is the answer you will receive

Quote:

Originally Posted by David603

Il2 (the only game I use FT in) lacks native support for FT, so yes.

so you're running a hacked game

LoBiSoMeM · #2 02-26-2011, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

so you're running a hacked game

LOL!

Oleg, this guy said that IL2 1946 is a hacked game!

I use FT in IL2 1946 too. I don't alter anything in IL2 1946, just run FT and tick the "evil hacked" interface to emulate the TIR interface and it's work.

Now we are running a "hacked game"?

W-R, you are a really sick person...

David603 · #3 02-26-2011, 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

accept that is the answer you will receive

Fair enough.

Quote:

so you're running a hacked game

Does it hurt anybody? I paid for my copy of Il2 1946, infact I have boxed versions of most of the Il2 series sitting on my shelf. Nor would I have brought TIR even if there was no way to get 6DOF in Il2 with FT, I would have ended up using FT with mouselook and 2DOF.

So, my conscience is clear on this matter.

Wolf_Rider · #4 02-26-2011, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David603

Does it hurt anybody? I paid for my copy of Il2 1946, infact I have boxed versions of most of the Il2 series sitting on my shelf. Nor would I have brought TIR even if there was no way to get 6DOF in Il2 with FT,

that just goes back to the; you don't own the software, you have a license to run the software. Does it hurt anyone? well, yes it does... using FT with NP software/ interface is theft. same as stealing from next door because it has an item your house doesn't.

Quote:

Originally Posted by David603

I would have ended up using FT with mouselook and 2DOF.

we'd only have to trust and take you at word on that one...

Quote:

Originally Posted by David603

So, my conscience is clear on this matter.

you'd be surprised of the amount of people, who, have a clear conscience on what they've done

LoBiSoMeM · #5 02-26-2011, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

that just goes back to the; you don't own the software, you have a license to run the software.

we'd only have to trust and take you at word on that one...

I don't bought anything from NP.

I run IL-2 1946 - that I bought - and Freetrack - free.

Freetrack don't use NP software to do the HT. Freetrack uses the data format of TIR to stream data to IL-2 1946.

You, W-R, as NP, have SEVERE problems to keep this "hack" talking! Is really fun to see!

Wolf_Rider · #6 02-26-2011, 12:46 PM

you know full well FT uses NP software

LoBiSoMeM · #7 02-26-2011, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

you know full well FT uses NP software

Besides the old unnencrypted interface? No, FT don't use NP software! And even that don't qualify use of "NP software"...

And YOU know full well, loser. Pathetic NP employee...

LoBiSoMeM · #8 02-26-2011, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

Besides the old unnencrypted interface? No, FT don't use NP software! And even that don't qualify use of "NP software"...

And YOU know full well, loser. Pathetic NP employee...

Running again, liar?

David603 · #9 02-26-2011, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

that just goes back to the; you don't own the software, you have a license to run the software. Does it hurt anyone? well, yes it does... using FT with NP software/ interface is theft. same as stealing from next door because it has an item your house doesn't.

Yes, I understand the court of law version of software use, but this isn't a court of law, so take my statement at face value or dismiss it as you wish, its my opinion, nothing else.

Quote:

we'd only have to trust and take you at word on that one...

Why would I lie? Again, this isn't a court of law.

Quote:

you'd be surprised of the amount of people, who, have a clear conscience on what they've done

Sure, and as an atheist I don't even believe in a conscience in biblical terms(a fixed sense of right and wrong "built into" every person), but I know if I hurt someone who doesn't deserve it or steal etc I will feel bad about it (and yes, I will use the court of law interpretations of this as a rough guide in this case).

However, given all that I don't feel bad about using software I paid for as I wish for my personal use (and I don't believe that FT using the open version of the NP interface falls outside that).

Wolf_Rider · #10 02-26-2011, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David603

Yes, I understand the court of law version of software use, but this isn't a court of law, so take my statement at face value or dismiss it as you wish, its my opinion, nothing else.

you "understanding" seems to differ from your 'opinion" though

Quote:

Originally Posted by David603

Why would I lie? Again, this isn't a court of law.

Sure, and as an atheist I don't even believe in a conscience in biblical terms(a fixed sense of right and wrong "built into" every person), but I know if I hurt someone who doesn't deserve it or steal etc I will feel bad about it (and yes, I will use the court of law interpretations of this as a rough guide in this case).

hmmm... a touch of selectivity there

Quote:

Originally Posted by David603

However, given all that I don't feel bad about using software I paid for as I wish for my personal use (and I don't believe that FT using the open version of the NP interface falls outside that).

too much inconsistency for anything to taken seriously at face value or otherwise

(Pol Pot, and similar, had clear consciences too)