![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Aviar
__________________
Intel i7-4790 4-Core @3.60GHz Asus Z97-C Motherboard 16GB DDR-3 1600 SDRAM @800 MHz NVIDIA GTX 760 - 2GB Creative SB ZX SBX Logitech X-530 5.1 Speakers 27" AOC LED - 2752 Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard CH FighterStick-Pro Throttle-Pro Pedals Logitech G13 Gameboard GoFlight GF-T8 Module WIN 8.1 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Almost Realistic But Not Quite..!
Just to get bomber work authentic, too, reminding of the three main errors of this otherways truthful flight simulator: 1. Bomb SALVO settings. 2. Fuse settings for pilot to manage. 3. Missing bomb damage after pilot hit. Nr 1 means that this sim has a queer property of dropping bombs as pairs. I guess that we are rather unanimous that back in those days bomb effect was with all efforts maximized. It would have been unprecedentedly foolish to waste bomb effect by dropping bombs as pairs into the same spot! Luckily, there already is a fix available for this IL sim 'idiot pairs of bombs' dilemma so it should not be very difficult to set correct with some future patch, I hope! Nr 2 means of course that for every mission bombs were funished with a fuse best suited for that particular mission. Again, bombs were never carried to be wasted in those days! It was crew's choice to say the last word about fuse that would be best for the mission. Pilot select should be the case with this sim, too, if we wish to further keep the sim historically accurate instead of becoming just another fancy game? Nr 3 is the IL sim curious feature that bombs released before but exploding after flak or enemy interceptor has hit the bomber pilot do not cause any damage. In reality, bombs of course were quite as dangerous even after the aircraft that dropped them was hit. Regards, - J. Hartikka - Finland There are wartime photos I added to messages http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...d=1#post210220 and http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...782#post213782 and http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...588#post216588 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Theres something strange about the Bk 3.7 gondola... with 4.09 i was able to hit almost any given tank and destroy it now with 4.10 it seem to have an even bigger fall even when i'm doing almost 90º against the tank O.O
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Has been reported and will be corrected in the mini patch.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Guys,
Sorry to be a pest but this is the third time I ask and I did not have any answer yet. There is a problem with the saitek x65f joystick. The dual throttle does not work fine with IL2. The right throttle is not recognized by the software. It reads it as a two positions switch (even if it call it a slider, it only has two positions once linked, 0% or 50%). It is not a problem with the saitek sofware (i have checked all possibilities). There is a mistake in the way IL2 communicate with it. Please Team Daidalos, give some light into this: Is it fixable? are you aware of it? Do you have the means (saitek support for example) to fix it? I thinking about selling the joy and getting the warthog instead... but still do not know if it will work or i will get the same problem. Please can you drop a single line to comment on this? |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I use the engines on seperate axis on my controller. Both engines selected, using the slider for left is doing fine until I reach 100%, then it pulls the right engine to 100% as well, and vice versa for the right slider.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Aviar
__________________
Intel i7-4790 4-Core @3.60GHz Asus Z97-C Motherboard 16GB DDR-3 1600 SDRAM @800 MHz NVIDIA GTX 760 - 2GB Creative SB ZX SBX Logitech X-530 5.1 Speakers 27" AOC LED - 2752 Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard CH FighterStick-Pro Throttle-Pro Pedals Logitech G13 Gameboard GoFlight GF-T8 Module WIN 8.1 |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nope. Because the rest of the two engined planes don't have this problem.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Aiming point of all guns on the FW190A8 FW190A9 is below the center of Revi circle.
FW190A6 that is OK. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
By the way,
if the records could provide wingtip smoke for aircraft , that would be better to review the quick records of fight. |
![]() |
|
|