Just a little update on the bombs:
I found some historical data concerning the destruction radius for German SC bombs and FAB 5000.
Since some of TD said the shrapnel-radius needs to be taken into account for FABs blast-radius in game, I want to post a table for the shrapnel radius that I found in Wolfgang Thamms book
Fliegerbomben:
- Bomb__Shrapnel-Radius
- SC50_______32,5m_______25m in game
- SC250______65m_________77m in game
- SC500______95m_________82m in game
- SC1000____180m________168m in game
- SC2000____350m________275,8m in game
Here is why the FABs destruction radius in game is very dubious:
The most common explosive in FAB bombs used was Amatol(exception FAB50 using pure TNT).
SC bombs contained a mix of 40% Amatol and 60% TNT.
The TNT equivalent for Amatol is given with 0,85. That means it´s less powerful.
Accordingly the TNT equivalent of SCs is 0,94 where the FABs TNT equivalent is 0,85, which results in 9% more explosive power for the SC bombs in comparison to FAB bombs.
Historically the SC bombs had a heavier filling than the FAB bombs.
I found a source in the internet giving away the blast radius of a
FAB 5000 with
428m!!! in game we have
2500m!!!
Another source states the radii to destroy concrete/wood in FAB bombs are:
FAB-50____12m/
25m(stone/
wood)____
25m in game
FAB-100___18m/
35m(stone/
wood)____
50m in game
FAB-250___28m/
56m(stone/
wood)____
50m in game
FAB-500___40m/
80m(stone/
wood)___
250m in game
FAB-1000_55m/
112m(stone/
wood)___
500m in game
FAB-5000_____
428m(_____/
wood)__
2500m in game
With this historical data in the background, I
kindly ask TD to change the blast radius of FAB and SC bombs.
Another concern was that some of the German
cockpits are historical
incorrect, along with
temperature problems of Bf-110, underheat in
I-185.
Is TD interested in data on that to be able to do a change?