Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2061  
Old 12-16-2010, 04:31 PM
W32Blaster W32Blaster is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 83
Default

Thats why the release still is called 410 ?!
  #2062  
Old 12-16-2010, 04:31 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Can I have one of the improved "bis" versions please?

__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
  #2063  
Old 12-17-2010, 07:45 AM
Qpassa's Avatar
Qpassa Qpassa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Valladolid-Spain-EU
Posts: 700
Default

will be any news before christmas?
__________________
Expecting:
Call of Duty

Youtube Profile: http://www.youtube.com/user/E69Qpassa
  #2064  
Old 12-17-2010, 11:45 AM
flying flying is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 24
Default

THE development of 4.10 has taken almost as long as World war two itself,I'm losing all
patience.
  #2065  
Old 12-17-2010, 11:49 AM
DD_crash's Avatar
DD_crash DD_crash is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Buckley North Wales
Posts: 307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flying View Post
THE development of 4.10 has taken almost as long as World war two itself,I'm losing all
patience.
Dont be silly.
  #2066  
Old 12-17-2010, 12:06 PM
The Kraken The Kraken is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 317
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flying View Post
THE development of 4.10 has taken almost as long as World war two itself,I'm losing all
patience.
Not much of a loss though.
  #2067  
Old 12-17-2010, 12:19 PM
flying flying is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DD_crash View Post
Dont be silly.
you too.
  #2068  
Old 12-17-2010, 12:55 PM
II/JG54_Emil II/JG54_Emil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 208
Default

Just a little update on the bombs:

I found some historical data concerning the destruction radius for German SC bombs and FAB 5000.

Since some of TD said the shrapnel-radius needs to be taken into account for FABs blast-radius in game, I want to post a table for the shrapnel radius that I found in Wolfgang Thamms book Fliegerbomben:
  • Bomb__Shrapnel-Radius
  • SC50_______32,5m_______25m in game
  • SC250______65m_________77m in game
  • SC500______95m_________82m in game
  • SC1000____180m________168m in game
  • SC2000____350m________275,8m in game


Here is why the FABs destruction radius in game is very dubious:

The most common explosive in FAB bombs used was Amatol(exception FAB50 using pure TNT).
SC bombs contained a mix of 40% Amatol and 60% TNT.
The TNT equivalent for Amatol is given with 0,85. That means it´s less powerful.
Accordingly the TNT equivalent of SCs is 0,94 where the FABs TNT equivalent is 0,85, which results in 9% more explosive power for the SC bombs in comparison to FAB bombs.

Historically the SC bombs had a heavier filling than the FAB bombs.

I found a source in the internet giving away the blast radius of a FAB 5000 with 428m!!! in game we have 2500m!!!
Quote:
one must think with horrific effect, as well-- the calculated zone of lethality for a non-armoured target in proximity to a 'normally fused' FAB 5000 blast was given as 428 meters!!

http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/Research/O...5000/index.php
Another source states the radii to destroy concrete/wood in FAB bombs are:
FAB-50____12m/25m(stone/wood)____25m in game
FAB-100___18m/35m(stone/wood)____50m in game
FAB-250___28m/56m(stone/wood)____50m in game
FAB-500___40m/80m(stone/wood)___250m in game
FAB-1000_55m/112m(stone/wood)___500m in game


With this historical data in the background, I kindly ask TD to change the blast radius of FAB and SC bombs.

Another concern was that some of the German Cockpits weren´t historical correct.
Is TD interested in data on that to be able to do a change?
  #2069  
Old 12-17-2010, 01:09 PM
daidalos.team daidalos.team is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 187
Default

@Emil: Please use the proper way of reporting errors or requests which is much more easier for us to follow than going through many pages of public forums: our email address. Thanks a lot.

Martin
  #2070  
Old 12-17-2010, 01:11 PM
II/JG54_Emil II/JG54_Emil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 208
Default

Aha.

Where do I find the email?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.