Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-19-2010, 09:53 AM
T}{OR's Avatar
T}{OR T}{OR is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 833
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sutts View Post
I'm pretty sure COMP or CO stands for Compressor i.e. the Supercharger gear setting - Hi, Lo or Neutral I suppose...but I think the early Spits had single speed, single stage superchargers.
The only thing is that "COMP" was on the Ju-88 screen. I have to agree, Compressor indeed sounds as it may be what it stands for.
__________________

LEVEL BOMBING MANUAL v2.0 | Dedicated Bomber Squadron
'MUSTANG' - compilation of online air victories

Last edited by T}{OR; 12-19-2010 at 10:12 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-19-2010, 03:35 PM
CRO_Adriatic CRO_Adriatic is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Croatia Cres
Posts: 39
Default

Sory fo my english...
Maybe explosion wos wrong word, "ekspanzija" in my languge, if it is expazion in english, well, it is not my profesion to talk about it...
http://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eksplozija

On race cars and motorbikes we can see it during day, also whan you squezze the engine in way it is not ment to be used, flames are normal...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-19-2010, 04:02 PM
Il2Pongo Il2Pongo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 88
Default

So my post about the main wheel of the 109 not being flush with the wing was deleted because it was out of context?
Really? A comment on the picture posted by the dev is not in context
What kind of "moderation" is that?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-19-2010, 06:08 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Il2Pongo View Post
So my post about the main wheel of the 109 not being flush with the wing was deleted because it was out of context?
Really? A comment on the picture posted by the dev is not in context
What kind of "moderation" is that?

In my opinion it was due to the angle of view; to my brain it looked flush, but I admit that the perspective was weird.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-20-2010, 12:04 AM
Splitter Splitter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 431
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T}{OR View Post
The only thing is that "COMP" was on the Ju-88 screen. I have to agree, Compressor indeed sounds as it may be what it stands for.
Yep, that actually makes more sense. Good catch,
Sutts. I still hope that manifold pressure it accurately modeled as part of the better complex engine management....which effects exhaust color too I guess .

Splitter
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-20-2010, 02:05 AM
Goanna1 Goanna1 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11
Default Thanks

To Oleg and Co.
Amazing level of detail that you and your team are bringing to this new sim.
Fantastic effort - greatly appreciated

Have a happy Christmas and an even better New Year for 2011
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-20-2010, 08:06 AM
T}{OR's Avatar
T}{OR T}{OR is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 833
Default

A quick summary after watching all the videos posted here, and following the discussion.

Quote:
Lets not get too carried away...
Precisely that. Like someone already stated that these flames are deliberately overdone.

There are few factors we should consider when talking about (visible) engine exhaust flames:
  1. All videos show planes standing or taxiing on the ground.
  2. Although visible on many videos, most of us will agree that they are barely visible - or invisible during daylight.

Thus I will point out to three videos which IMHO more accurately represent what should (can) be seen in real life and thus in the game.

"Seafire night ground run" - watch how high RPM affects engine exhaust:

The thing everyone forgot to mention is a very fast stream of air which is blowing over the exhaust stacks (with higher RPM) - undoubtedly much faster and colder once the plane is airborne => further reducing the exhaust flames length because of the fast air stream and also a small portion due to forced convection (cold air cooling the exhaust pipes).

Just like Oleg said:
Quote:
Please read with atention: The color of exhaust from the direct pipe and from the extended are different. The temperatue of the flame decreasing with the longer leght of pipe. More lower temperature...



"Spitfire MH 434 - Part 3/5" - this, I believe is how the flames should be represented in the game, starting from 5:30 (fast forward) first the engine start is shown and then camera shows directly into the exhaust stacks:

After slightly over primed start the only visible flames are during engine start (due to some fuel left from previous unsuccessful attempts). Once the engine has been started watch how there are no flames exiting the exhaust pipes, even when RPM is increased - although they are visible under the right angle (when looking directly into the exhaust pipes like shown in the video).


And last, the most important video IMO... "Bf 109 Stack Flaming" - posted by Richie, which although doesn't feature exhaust flames, it shows exhaust smoke when changing throttle:

If I would have to choose between the right colored exhaust flames and correctly represented puffs of smoke when changing throttle => I would without a doubt choose the latter because it impacts gameplay and is overall more important feature.
__________________

LEVEL BOMBING MANUAL v2.0 | Dedicated Bomber Squadron
'MUSTANG' - compilation of online air victories

Last edited by T}{OR; 12-20-2010 at 08:14 AM. Reason: typos
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-20-2010, 09:20 AM
Richie's Avatar
Richie Richie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,450
Default

A picture of a 109 G-4 low on a darker day with no flames.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Red 7 Low.jpg (195.4 KB, 28 views)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-20-2010, 09:26 AM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,719
Default

(quote)T}{OR
If I would have to choose between the right colored exhaust flames and correctly represented puffs of smoke when changing throttle => I would without a doubt choose the latter because it impacts gameplay and is overall more important feature.


I agree, there's something about turbo's that causes a dark smoke after a quick throttle increase...even in todays world with on road vehicles and their modern engines. So I like the idea of the 109 having that behavior
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-20-2010, 10:00 AM
T}{OR's Avatar
T}{OR T}{OR is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 833
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlipBall View Post
I agree, there's something about turbo's that causes a dark smoke after a quick throttle increase...even in todays world with on road vehicles and their modern engines. So I like the idea of the 109 having that behavior
Pressure-charging might indeed have a bit increased effect on the smoke puffs during throttle changes. Unless I am mistaken, WW2 planes had only superchargers, not turbochargers.

Combustion during constant RPM is totally different than one during variable RPM. The reason for this is rapidly changing and unequal ratio of fuel and air in the cylinder (variable mixture) - accompanied with black puffs of smoke coming out of the exhaust manifold. Once you set on an desired RPM it takes the engine few seconds to 'stabilize'. Fuel consumption is also much higher during these frequent throttle changes, when compared to running at constant RPM (i.e. just like city / highway driving).

Just like you said - the best example are trucks, when the driver adds power it is always accompanied with thick black smoke coming out of the exhaust. Once it is driving with a constant speed, there is barely any smoke coming out of the exhaust. As far as turbos and truck engines... sometimes it takes up to 2-3 minutes for the exhaust gases to 'stabilize' and spin the turbo for it to have a desired effect.
__________________

LEVEL BOMBING MANUAL v2.0 | Dedicated Bomber Squadron
'MUSTANG' - compilation of online air victories
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.