1C's stance on head-tracking devices for BoB?

[Wolf_Rider]

that's the only link I've given to grunch yesterday andyjwest... is there something you don't understand again?

[AndyJWest]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

that's the only link I've given to grunch yesterday andyjwest... is there something you don't understand again?

Yes, I don't understand what the heck this has to do with intimidation. Do yo not understand how a search engine works? Just because it found articles with the words you entered in it, doesn't indicate that they are even referring to what you are, never mind 'proving it. When I looked, this was the first article on the list: http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?f...ogId=439120001

It is in German:

Freetrack von SWISS bei PLATZ 1 bis Donnerstag !!!
So leute es geht wieder ab , SWISS und ich haben geschrieben und es ist dazu gekomm das er gesagt hat wenn wir bis Donnerstag SWISS auf PLATZ 1 bei MTV ROOKIE kriegen , wird es einen FREETRACK geben !!! also was heißt das ??? genau VOTEN VOTEN VOTEN !!! aber das kriegen wir hin !!! Der FREETRACK wird HAMMER werden !!!! das kann ich schonmal sagen !!!

Or from Google Translate:

Freetrack of SWISS in TABLE 1 through Thursday!
So people go off again, SWISS and I have written and it is this which he has been told if we get to Thursday SWISS TABLE 1 at MTV ROOKIE, there will be a FREE TRACK! So what does that mean?? just VOTE VOTE VOTE! but we get out! The FREE TRACK will HAMMER!! I can tell schonmal!

Now provide proof of 'intimidation'.

[Wolf_Rider]

now you're just being deliberately silly and predictable, andyjwest... grunch didn't have any problem

linking directly would, in my opinion, put me in breach of the stated guidelines for this forum... or is that what you are hoping for?

[AndyJWest]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

now you're just being deliberately silly and predictable, andyjwest...

linking directly would, in my opinion, put me in breach of the stated guidelines for this forum... or is that what you are hoping for?

I'm not being 'deliberately silly', I'm asking you to provide proof. You claimed that you had posted a link to such proof. You didn't. You provided a link to a search engine.

And no, I'm not 'hoping' to get you to breach forum guidelines. Since I don't have a clue as to what it is you are alleging, there is no way I could know whether such a breach was a possibility. Once again you seem incapable of providing straight answers to simple questions, but instead have to add another layer of complexity and confusion.

Now, I'll ask again, where is the proof of 'intimidation'. If you can't provide a link, at least provide a search string that doesn't come up with random irrelevance. If you are struggling with this, PM me, and I'll show you the easiest way to do it. Come to that, why not just PM me the link...

[julian265]

Or maybe an indication of the name of the link to be clicked from your search?

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by AndyJWest

another layer of complexity and confusion.

Now, I'll ask again, where is the proof of 'intimidation'. If you can't provide a link, at least provide a search string that doesn't come up with random irrelevance. If you are struggling with this, PM me, and I'll show you the easiest way to do it. Come to that, why not just PM me the link...

err, grunch had no trouble andyjwest and rest assured, the confusion is of your own making.

You've got your link, so have a read

Originally Posted by julian265

BTW I interpret the allowing of unmoderated discussion of this topic, on this forum, as a good sign.

yes, that is good

[AndyJWest]

You've got your link, so have a read

Read what?

Grunch, if you are still bothering to follow this nonsense, can I ask whether you know what the heck Wolf_Rider is referring to?

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by AndyJWest

Read what?

Grunch, if you are still bothering to follow this nonsense, can I ask whether you know what the heck Wolf_Rider is referring to?

How about you start playing the ball, instead of the player??... there's a good boy

[AndyJWest]

Ok, I'll take a wild guess, since Wolf_Rider isn't being very helpful, and assume that I'm supposed to be looking at the forum the search finds that actually refers to FreeTrack. Now what am I supposed to do? Read every posting to look for evidence of 'intimidation'? Why the heck should I? He made the accusation, so it is up to him to provide the evidence. He need not provide a link to the site if he provides a reasonable length quote from the relevant postings - I can search for them myself (though quoting from them shouldn't breach forum rules anyway).

I've had this sort of internet 'debate' before. First, the 'evidence' is supposedly so obvious that a link isn't needed, but I ask for it anyway. And surprise surprise, it isn't obvious at all, but is to be found somewhere or other, and if I can't find it, it is clearly my fault. The punchline in such 'debates' usually turns out to be that there is no 'evidence', just the unverifiable interpretation of some minor bit of text posted by no-one of consequence.

The only real mystery in the is why Wolf_Rider is so concerned with NPs 'property rights', given his assurances that he has no involvement with them.