
09-25-2009, 12:19 PM
|
Approved Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 29
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancient Seraph
My 'adapt blabla' was referenced to an earlier comment about how pilots in the actual WWII would adapt to the jets and all that.
Worse in what?
Arado: - Payload? Not as much as the B17, but that's compensated for by the short time it takes to reach the target, drop bombs, respawn and come back again.
- Gunners? Not as much as any bomber, but that's compensated for by the speed, with which no piston pilot can even dream of flying.
- Manouvrability? It'll turn just as hard or easy as a B17. Admittedly, it's less agile then the He-111, but that's compensated for by payload.
Fighter jets: - Armament? Me-262 has some nice cannons on there, with less recoil than similar planes.
- Manouvrability? Obviously compensated for with speed.
- Armor? So what? It's not like anyone keeps up.
I have respect for people that can B&Z, and with some planes you must, but all the planes that are designed for B&Z instead of T&B are still vulnerable to other aircraft, except for the jets. A master of B&Z will be invincible in a jet, period. Unless someone else grabs a jet.
|
Depends, an ME 262 can be easy to shoot down unless you have experience pilots who knows not to out turn a piston fighter..
|