Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2012, 02:16 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Snapper View Post
The hundreds of hours (literally) most of us have virtually flown on type (for both sides) to believe this notwithstanding, the RAF models alone are hobbled with huge radiator drag, with radiator surface area assigned three times the surface area of the 109's TWO radiators combined, with the double whammy of the RAF rads being assigned a drag coefficient 40% greater than their 109 counterparts.
Is this a fact or a feeling? I have the relevant radiator areas, so what are the figures and from where?

Quote:
The devs are aware of this, and they should be made aware of all instrument error -- including the dodgy Rate of Climb indicator in the RAF aircraft as well.
As I understand the indicators have "electric" and "mechanical" types in the sim. Could it be that real world RAF and LW preferred different type of instruments, and this is modelled (perhaps wrongly) in the sim?
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-18-2012, 02:20 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
As I understand the indicators have "electric" and "mechanical" types in the sim
only the RPM gauges.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-18-2012, 02:24 PM
pstyle pstyle is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
Is this a fact or a feeling? I have the relevant radiator areas, so what are the figures and from where?
Hey kufürst, Dutch put a wee post someplace about how thwy had measured this.. I don't have a link right now tho.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-18-2012, 02:33 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pstyle View Post
Hey kufürst, Dutch put a wee post someplace about how thwy had measured this.. I don't have a link right now tho.
Hiya pstyle. I posted a video of the effect of radiator drag in the Spit alone. It's post #16 in this thread. This didn't actually measure the relative surface areas Snapper mentions.

Just thought I'd better clarify that.

Last edited by ATAG_Dutch; 09-18-2012 at 02:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-18-2012, 02:34 PM
pstyle pstyle is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Dutch View Post
Hiya pstyle. I posted a video of the effect of radiator drag in the Spit alone. This didn't actually measure the relative surface areas Snapper mentions.

Just thought I'd better clarify that.
Roger, cheers for the correction.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-18-2012, 02:24 PM
ATAG_Snapper's Avatar
ATAG_Snapper ATAG_Snapper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,286
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
Is this a fact or a feeling? I have the relevant radiator areas, so what are the figures and from where?

Fact.

As I understand the indicators have "electric" and "mechanical" types in the sim. Could it be that real world RAF and LW preferred different type of instruments, and this is modelled (perhaps wrongly) in the sim?
That could well be, I'm only reporting what others have measured in sim.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.