Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 07-03-2012, 05:24 PM
BlackBerry BlackBerry is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post

Your theory is not based on facts. It would be a fundamental error to toss aside convention of n = ~.85 for it.

The test air speed is below 0.4Mach or 0.2 mach . Of course, 0.4 Mach is just a cruise speed, at medium-low speed, 3-blade CSP could get constant propeller efficiency within envelop.

4-blade propeller efficiency drops from 90% to 85% while 3-blade remaining constant 81%.....


If you test propeller with slow air speed and small propeller rpm, a 4-blade propeller could maintain constant efficiency up to 3.6 advance ratio.

It is the high Mach number decrease propeller efficiency. No air compressibility, no significant effociency drop.

Btw, in late WWII, almost 100% allied aircrafts equipped with 4-blade propeller.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1080.jpg (332.6 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1081.jpg (217.2 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1082.jpg (228.6 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1083.jpg (208.3 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1084.jpg (131.1 KB, 2 views)

Last edited by BlackBerry; 07-04-2012 at 02:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.