![]() |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So allow me to quote myself, i.e. Quote:
That being the cg was not affected, by the BMW to Jumo engine swap, because the inner wing was not swept.. Because they could have simply corrected the cg by adding mass installing internal ballast forward of the cg instead of adding mass forward of the cg by sweeping the inner wing forward. Which is pretty standard stuff that is done all the time.. If I recall correctly, the Bf109 had a 60lb ballast weight installed rear of the cg to compensate for the heavier engines. As I noted, it is not the optimal way of doing things, but it is an 'easy' way of doing what has to be done. In that simple physics dictates they would have to correct the cg due to the extra mass of the Jumo behind the cg one way or another But I digress As to the 'reason' why the inner wings were swept forward.. I just brought up the possibility that the inner wings were swept as part of the cg correction process.. As in the fillets would add more weight forward of the cg. That and doing it for that 'reason' would agree with what STORMBIRDS said about the 'reason' the wings were swept, i.e. to correct the cg due to the heavier than expected engines. On that note, up to now you have admitted that the outer wings were swept to correct the cg, but you contend that the 'reason' the inner wings were swept forward was to take advantage of swept wing theory.. Even though most if not all agree that 18 degree sweep is too small to achieve any significant advantage in increasing the critical Mach number.. Which begs the question.. If the Germans fully understood swept wing theory.. Why would they go to all the trouble of sweeping the inner wings forward 18 degree is they knew in advance it would not increase the critical Mach number? Which did not make any sense to me, so I started doing a little more research and I actually found the 'reason' the Germans swept the inner wings forward.. Granted I still consider STORMBIRDS the.. how did you say it? Qualified Authorities on the subject of the Me262 But as you know, for some reason, they had nothing to say with regards to the 'reason' the inner wings were swept forward, it is almost as if they went out of their way to say nothing. All we know for sure is that when given the chance to give the Germans credit for taking advantage of swept wing theory, they said nothing but to confirm that the outer wings were swept to correct the cg. But I digress During my research I did find a source that noted the 'reason' the inner wings were swept forward.. And guess what! It had nothing to do with the cg or swept wing theory! http://naziscienceliveson.devhub.com...or-compromise/ Quote:
Neither of which were done to take advantage of swept wing theory Hope that helps! S!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 06-14-2012 at 01:38 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|