Why still no dive acceleration difference?

[MadBlaster]

I see you were still writing.

Originally Posted by BlackBerry

The teeth had been taken by someone who, for some reason, didn't pay enough attention to high Mach number/compressibility effect which leads to efficiency decrease of a CSP.[/B]

You have to audit the numbers coming out of the sim using devicelink tool. That is the only way you could prove it. I tend to think that would be rather difficult. There's probably some stuff you need visibility on that devicelink numbers don't tell you. Maybe some randomness. For example, rudder yaw. But you have the input parameters show in this thread a few posts back, so you could do reasonableness approximation to get comfortable with it. You could build your own algorithm in C++, put in those input parameters, and run it with output to a file. then check that output to devicelink numbers from the sim. if the numbers are close, then it is accounted for. if not, then your statement could be true. otherwise, it is speculation. Crumpp says he thinks it is accounted for in standard formulation and generated some output that does not disprove his conjecture.