Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 08-23-2011, 07:02 AM
Ataros Ataros is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USSR
Posts: 2,439
Default

We should all become active participants of their forums and then promote CloD when they gather enough audience
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 08-23-2011, 07:31 AM
Mysticpuma's Avatar
Mysticpuma Mysticpuma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bromsgrove, UK
Posts: 1,059
Default

Well 1C have already released there Alpha and many people have paid to test it, at-least Gaijin made there's free
__________________
http://i41.tinypic.com/2yjr679.png
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 08-23-2011, 07:38 AM
Gourmand Gourmand is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 208
Default

whoot? pacific war? and man in the carrier near the plane for release the gear !!!
why COD don't make it too
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 08-23-2011, 09:17 AM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
Im gonna make a game called WOA (World of Acronyms)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
Already been done, it's called DCS A10.
Not trying to slight DCS or anything, but this is funny because it's probably true. All those fancy J-acronyms like JTAC, JDAM, J this, J that (seems that everything is a "joint something" today ) are actually getting me to the point of memory overload and i get more confused trying to remember what each one means than finding it helpful in a hurry, i think it's because we've gone from 2-3 letter acronyms to "turn a sentence into an acronym"

On a serious note, i would love to try some DCS action because i'm a systems simulation freak, but this acronym business (to the point of even renaming things that have been around for ages to conform to the new system, which confuses me further) is the reason i haven't bought either of the two games. I would get all masochist trying to learn it and do things properly and then i fear my head would explode
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 08-23-2011, 09:50 AM
SNAFU SNAFU is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 324
Default

Then you should go for DCS Blackshark. The acronyms are kept in russian / cyrillic letters.

... and I don´t even try to remember them, you just need to know, which switch is responsible for what, and why...
__________________
http://cornedebrouwer.nl/cf48e
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 08-23-2011, 10:43 AM
esmiol esmiol is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gourmand View Post
whoot? pacific war? and man in the carrier near the plane for release the gear !!!
why COD don't make it too
because it is easier to do on an arcade game gourmand you have other priority to devellop on a sims

but if it was possible i thing it will be great too
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 08-23-2011, 01:39 PM
ChrisDNT ChrisDNT is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 298
Default

Why all these video and screenshot makers are always using too wide focals, what makes aircraft look like ridiculous bananas ?
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 08-23-2011, 02:37 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

The funny thing:

- I bought Wings Of Prey. Good graphics engine, but lousy FM, DM, gameplay, no dedicated servers, poor ground units, air start...

And Gaijin almost drop development of this "alpha" of World Of Planes...

People blame Maddox Games for lot of things... We are all voluntary guinea pigs! And we PAY for that! LOL!
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 08-23-2011, 08:13 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

To the poster above; it's all relevent on how the game is marketed. WoP never promised anything more than that. CloD did.

It's like moaning why CoD isn't similar to Arma.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 08-23-2011, 08:46 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
To the poster above; it's all relevent on how the game is marketed. WoP never promised anything more than that. CloD did.

It's like moaning why CoD isn't similar to Arma.
A big LOL now...

Please... Have a look at "to do" things in WoP forums and stop talking nonsense...

http://forum.gaijinent.com/index.php...d-suggestions/

Since first month we hear these things, just to point some:

"Features requested and planned:
* dedicated server
* votes
* mission editor
* quick mission editor
* plane customizations"

"Planned" until today... And a lot of thigs "done" are porked... Let's face it: WoP was sold, the "community" requests are not put in the sim, but in other title. To me it's OK. I don't take my pants off because i payed 50 bucks in some software, but some here "dislike" MG long support for their "alpha sims".

I love it! I fly in IL-2 1946 until today!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.