![]() |
|
Men of War New World War II strategy game |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alot of guys have rated COH higher than MOW for graphics,but i with a faily decent PC system & card,am amazed at this conclusion as on my system MOW looks fantastic,& highly detailed,maybe you guys need a new system or card update or something,& the special effect's & realism are also fantastic,in a game as the japs the other night,i fired a shell from a Chi-Ri at a firefly's front armour,it deflected off & hit another firefly to the left & just behind it,damaging its track,with a lovely ping to it aswell,if thats not realism i dont know what is,& the sound of the explosions,on my 5.1 system is just amazing.
![]() Where as what you get on COH is just to me average arcadey not terribly realistic graphics,& the sound of a rather annoying american general constantly going on at you to do this or do that or this is happening,i mean mate just shut up for 5 mins please. ![]() Last edited by Morgoth; 08-19-2009 at 06:17 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My Opinion is:
COH wins over MoW because of it being much more enjoyable to play, not too much micromanagement, easier to get into, brilliant audio throughout, better campaign design, visually stunning. Right that said, MoW is grand because: The level of detail, customizable units, number of units, theatres and the visual component of the game in it own right, is ok. With CoH I do feel like I've been had in the deal when you see the expanse that MoW is, but my points above certainly make up for it. CoH will lose out as MoW expands, Relic haven't given us anything extra (except ToV, which was weak) for a while now. These are my opinions |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
But I'm going to get nailed to the MoW wall here because in the game forum world you can't like two games in the same genre at the same time ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm wanting to get into MoW but my first born child just won't allow any time for gaming.
Hints and Tips from me: Complete all your games before having a child. Don't buy Empire total war... A tear wells in my eye as these games are in my steam account but I've not got time to play them... I enjoy both MoW and CoH. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I prefer realism in games so CoH dissapointed me, MoW is actually my top wwII rts, despite of horrible iface and some smaller issues. Last edited by lacki2000; 08-22-2009 at 06:49 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whats better in COH (mulitplayer)? I can say it to you:
1. More fairness of the players 2. No Spawnpointkillers 3. English Speakers/ the "universal language" (no one can understand you) 4. I can see on the statics, how good is the player (many games are not the result of good games) Thats the fact of no frustration! And in the moment i have a lot with the players in this game... It's a great pity, because the game is great! by the way... there are groups of good player, who want to play? And they are english speaker? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I totally loooove this game so much its like a ten times better then company of heroes
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CoH and MoW are different games. I never liked CoH coz there are many games like that: build a base, produce soldiers and let them fight. MoW is a niche game that is aimed at hardcore gamers: huge learning curve and lots of micro stills to practice.
I hope MoW retains its niche/hardcore status. But I doubt it coz too many games started with big ambitions but ended up disappointing their fans by focusing on the credit cards of casual players rather than increasing the fun and challenge. |
![]() |
|
|