Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2015, 12:44 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Furio View Post
I’ve already expressed my appreciation for Pursuivant’s excellent job. Reading through the results, looks like some of the claims about planes being “too fragile” or “too tough” are not substantiated by facts.
A very important fact to remember.

My ratings for how tough or fragile a particular plane's parts are are somewhat subjective.

They are primarily based on how many .50 caliber bullets are needed to break the part. That's objective. I've also described what parts will or won't break when exposed to unlimited gunfire, which is also objective.

But, my ratings are subjective because I've also included my opinions as to how tough that part "should" be - based on real life and compared to similar planes in the game.

For example, if a small, single-engined plane like the U-2VS requires 5+ seconds of sustained fire to break a wing or fuselage, then it's probably "over modeled" and gets a rating of "Very Tough" or "Incredibly Tough" (5 or 6 rating). But, if the same amount of gunfire is required to break the wing or fuselage of a heavy bomber, then I'd probably give that part a rating of "Very fragile" or "A bit fragile (2 or 3 rating).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.