![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sadly I think in a few years the new sim will be history.
I don't think they understand the market, or the needs of the player base. On an up note, my new computer build has finally allowed me to play the Finnish Hawk Campaign in this sim. Just got back into it, but enjoying it, even though I'm stuck in Fokkers and Hurries for the moment. As you know I'm not much of an off line guy, but a well crafted off line experience is well worth the time spent.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
El is right, I fear.
Even if not, there is a huge difference in development cost for each new plane type between the “New Game” and “Good Old Il2”. Ten to one? Twenty to one? Perhaps more, and I can’t even guess the ratio if we talk about carriers. In short, I think the chances to have in the New Game a plane set comparable to Good Old Il2 are really slim. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Shame there's no P-61 either
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
That’s another type under the Gxxxxxn-Nxxxxxxp ban. I would love to have it flyable, of course, but, giving the time and resources limitation faced by developers (read: TD), choices are unavoidable.
My preference would go to complete already existing scenarios, such as the already mentioned Pacific Theatre. To me, it makes more sense to complete what we have, than have more incomplete scenarios. And – don’t shoot at me – I would shelve the whole night bombers-night fighters lot. Flying night interceptors would be simply to follow a different kind of mini-map, and then fire on a black silhouette barely visible in the dark. Flying bombers, it would be simply sit and wait for invisible fighters coming out from nowhere. That’s my opinion, of course. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And having a flyable late war German bomber would definitley add to this sim - any of them. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Including some variants from his He-111 pack would be a really good addition! A fixed H2, H6, H12 and a new H16 would be more than enough. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yt2 for now already part of DT )
__________________
work hard, fly fast |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Night bombing might have some appeal, but unless we get some of the night bombing aids, it's mostly an exercise in instrument flying and dead reckoning. Challenging, but not unique to IL2 or to night bombers. Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
yeah i want flyable Fw-200 too))
need find the person who could)
__________________
work hard, fly fast |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Another thing that would be useful and maybe even necessary - flames and or glow of exhausts. Quote:
Quote:
B-26 is one of my favourites, too, but to be honest -its roles can largley and without too much hassle be occupied by B-25/A-20. As sad as it is, there is no real need for this beautiful plane. |
![]() |
|
|