Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-27-2014, 05:50 AM
bladeracer bladeracer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Perth, WestOz
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurwin View Post
Yes icefire seems to be right.

Another thing to think about is the following: because bombers are so big targets - especially American viermots (B-17), actual pilot instruction was to open fire at double the range compared to normal engagement ranges (compared to small size fighters).

This above guideline was from German fighter manual 1944. Reasoning was, that the Germans of course calculated how many hits with cannons and MGs it took to destroy a bomber (not just damage it, but destroy/ shoot down).

Part of the calculation seemed to be that closure speeds were too high in all types of attack. There's not enough time to pepper the bomber, if you only start to shoot at about 300m distance. Americans didn't build their bombers out of bamboo and paper like Japanese may have done, American warbirds had been purposely built to be tough in their construction and design, it seems.

Of course the mk108 was a different solution for the bomber problem - you only needed few hits to destroy a heavy bomber.

Such reasoning would correspond to 600m for me, to open fire at bomber.
The bullets will be out of convergence , by definition, but they can still damage the bomber tremendously.


Aiming point needs to be slightly higher, you need slightly more deflection as the firing distance doubles to 600m, and you need to walk down the fire slightly as you make a diving attack.

So, effectively you lower the gunsight slightly into the correct 300m deflection position, as you dive closer to the enemy shooting at the same time. To my mind, this works quite well, even with .50cal.

What effectively happens in this case is that bomber gets shredded with hundreds of MG-bullets... In a P-47 this kind of attack could eat up a good portion of your ammo stores!

Sure, you spend lot of ammo, even if you're hitting him, but you're much more likely to kill a twin engine bomber, shall we say, in only one attack pass.

The price that you pay in ammunition stores in aircraft, you remeed in exchange for one-kill-attack, and it takes less time in the engagement zone, (when you're vulnerable with your attention focused on shooting down the bomber)
If you're flying a bomber interception, you could adjust your convergence to suit the mission.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-27-2014, 08:40 AM
Laurwin Laurwin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 87
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bladeracer View Post
If you're flying a bomber interception, you could adjust your convergence to suit the mission.
I suppose ur right, convergence at about 400m would help vs bombers a little bit.

I guess as a rule of thumb youd want to fire about +/- 50m within convergence range with wing guns.

You would get like a "box convergence" effect either slightly past convergence or slightly before it.

I have to say though that I have burned some wing tanks, with long .50cal burst, on Ju88 wing, even with heavily past of the convergence range (such as 300m conv, actual shooting done at 500m)

If you pepper the entire wing of the bomber, you're bound to hit the fuel tanks. Is all im gonna say!!!

Last edited by Laurwin; 04-27-2014 at 08:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-27-2014, 01:37 PM
gaunt1 gaunt1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: India
Posts: 314
Default

Both German and Japanese bombers are very weak. Aim for the engines, very easy to ignite them. You can kill lots of them even with planes that have low ammo supply and fairly weak armament, like Yaks and MiG-3. Treat He-111 and Ju-88 as unarmed, their defensive machineguns cant harm you. Do-217 is more dangerous, but nothing special.
On the other hand, G4M can be deadly with its 20mm gun.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-27-2014, 02:10 PM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

It is my experience that if you get hit or killed by bombers, you usually are too close to them. Their gunners will hit you pretty bad from close range, but from further out they are pretty much worthless. It is possible to stay out of their effective range and shoot them down from their 6 without bigger problems, as the usual player gunfire from a fighter aircraft is much more accurate than AI gunfire from a bomber. Likewise they won't hit you when you do frontal attacks, if you break early enough.

The downside is you will score less hits, but it is usually better to kill one bomber and get home to fly another day, than to shoot down three and die in the process. The second outcome will win you a battle, the first a war.

Also teamwork is a good thing, 4 fighters vs. 4 bombers is much worse for the bombers than 1 fighter vs. 1 bomber.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-27-2014, 08:25 PM
Laurwin Laurwin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 87
Default

B-17s tend to be more durable bombers even vs fw190?

Do they have any weak spots as they say?

or just the standard knock out the engines or kill pilot?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-27-2014, 08:43 PM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

The wing outside the outboard engine is very, very weak. You can easily chop it off with a couple of 20mm or you will set it on fire with even less hits.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-29-2014, 07:31 PM
majorfailure majorfailure is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurwin View Post
B-17s tend to be more durable bombers even vs fw190?

Do they have any weak spots as they say?

or just the standard knock out the engines or kill pilot?
Wing fuel tanks - few well placed rounds light them up good.
Though the usual frontal approach works very well, too and B-17s are slow so to set up the head-ons you don't need too much time - and in a Fw190 you can bring them down with even a not so well placed burst.
What I like to do - besides coming in from dead ahead, is getting well above and somewhat in front and to the right/left of the bomber, then dive down - my wings nearly parallel to the bombers direction of travel, and correct my approach with rudder. Shoot and exit safely behind bomber. Most of the time worth the effort - next to zilch chance to get hit by defensive fire. Additionally, the bomber flies through your bullet stream, and if you can get your aim lined up with targets cockpit/tanks (which by the way are bigger targets from above) you don't need to be spot on with timing.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-30-2014, 07:53 AM
Untamo's Avatar
Untamo Untamo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 329
Default

S!

I'm a mostly 109 pilot, but I think this tactic can be used in any fighter against bombers:

If possible, I will make an initial head-on attack targeting the cockpit. If the pilot isn't dead yet, I will proceed to climb over (and even a bit ahead of) the bomber from where I shall execute a 90 degree dive towards the bomber. When the bomber appears from under my nose, I start to lead him and open fire with MGs (which there are almost unlimited supply on the 109 ). When the MGs start to hit, I open with cannon. I get a good 3-5s of cannon time on the target with high deflection and exit the attack usually behind and under the target with high speed and pull up again infront of it. Rinse and repeat if necessary. Usually I don't get any hits at all on my plane, and usually the bomber ends up destroyed after the first overhead attack.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JtD View Post
The wing outside the outboard engine is very, very weak. You can easily chop it off with a couple of 20mm or you will set it on fire with even less hits.
Nice tip, I will try this.
__________________
AMD 1055T Hexacore@3,4GHz - 2x4GB 1600MHz DDR3 - ATI 6950 2GB, flashed to 6970 shaders - Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit - 30" LG W3000H (2560x1600) - TM Warthog Stick + Cougar Throttle - wooden DIY pedals with Hall sensor - FreeTrack

Last edited by Untamo; 04-30-2014 at 07:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.