Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-14-2009, 09:55 PM
Codex Codex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Vic, Australia
Posts: 624
Default

"Windows 7 and IL2... No love?"
Don't bother making any decisions on the new OS now. Test results showing how poorly IL-2 runs on Vista or W7 is a pointless exercise. Wait for SoW and the retail release of W7 and then worry about weather the new OS is worth your hard earned $$$.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-14-2009, 10:31 PM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Codex View Post
"Windows 7 and IL2... No love?"
Don't bother making any decisions on the new OS now. Test results showing how poorly IL-2 runs on Vista or W7 is a pointless exercise. Wait for SoW and the retail release of W7 and then worry about weather the new OS is worth your hard earned $$$.
Give that man a cookie! Be amazed that such an old game even runs on these new operating systems!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-15-2009, 11:57 AM
Thunderbolt56 Thunderbolt56 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 398
Default

I'm pretty sure Eco uses an 8800GTS. As far as the Windows7 beta, I'm not too concerned. While is popular (even politically correct at times) to bash MS, their track record in learning from their mistakes is pretty good. I doubt Windows7 will be any different. I'm still running XP Pro SP3 and intend to leap-frog Vista altogether. Preliminary reports on driver support, speed and compatibility of W7 all sound like things are moving in the right direction.

my .02c
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-26-2009, 02:20 PM
mondo mondo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt56 View Post
Preliminary reports on driver support, speed and compatibility of W7 all sound like things are moving in the right direction.
I've even heard devout haters of M$ like W7! It is certainly a step in the right direction for M$ and does work extremely well. It flies!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-15-2009, 09:00 PM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Uther View Post
Give that man a cookie! Be amazed that such an old game even runs on these new operating systems!
Mmm, the thing that worries me a bit though is that Vista has performed miserably in OGL and Vista 1.1 (Windows 7) seems to continue that tradition. The only modern "in engine" clip of SoW we have seen lately (the editor") was running in OpenGL...

A problem? Hope not... SoW will probably have DirectX support as well, lets just hope that it's not as bad as the dx mode in IL2 in that case. I don't really understand why to bother doing both OpenGL and dx if you only release the game on the Windows platform though...

Anyway - it's the first public beta and it's so much better than Vista was 12 months before release...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-15-2009, 10:08 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

I have no performance issues using OpenGL in Vista. Whats the problem?

Indeed it is good to see that Windows 7's development even in beta form is quite good. I was reading about the UI and usability of the new taskbar/dock system and it sounds fantastic once people get used to it.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-15-2009, 10:51 PM
Codex Codex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Vic, Australia
Posts: 624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mazex View Post
Mmm, the thing that worries me a bit though is that Vista has performed miserably in OGL and Vista 1.1 (Windows 7) seems to continue that tradition. The only modern "in engine" clip of SoW we have seen lately (the editor") was running in OpenGL...

A problem? Hope not... SoW will probably have DirectX support as well, lets just hope that it's not as bad as the dx mode in IL2 in that case. I don't really understand why to bother doing both OpenGL and dx if you only release the game on the Windows platform though...

Anyway - it's the first public beta and it's so much better than Vista was 12 months before release...
It's not OpenGL that is the issue, it's running IL-2 on a modern Windows OS that has a completely different way of displaying dots on the screen than XP. Under XP OpenGL, DX and the GDI existed side by side and all on top of the NT Kernal which meant function calls made via any one of the APIs could directly access the hardware.

With Vista and future versions of Windows, all OpenGL graphical function calls are now made through a couple more layers before getting to the hardware, where DX function calls go straight through to the hardware.





While you may say this means is OpenGL is slower, I would argue only very slightly. The real reason IL-2 is slower on Vista than XP is that it doesn't make use of the new WDDM. As DX10 games basically have unhindered access system memory, CPU and GPU resources, where older games have to share with other apps.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-16-2009, 02:24 AM
TX-EcoDragon TX-EcoDragon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 55
Default

Yes, I run an 8800GTS 512 card, and was running 178 series drivers in each OS (though a different version is provided by nVidia for Win7).

I did see a few fps less in win 7 vs vista, but keep in mind that we are talking about 2.6% average fps decrease.

I've added system specs to that post (at the end).

FSX saw a 7.8% performance loss at Medium-High settings, and pretty much no loss at Ultra High settings. My usual settings are in between, so I see about 3 fps less than usual by running 7 vs XP.

Black Shark had crazy GAINS in performance, minimum fps increased by more than a factor of 4, average fps were nearly doubled.

So for the imperceptible loss in IL-2, the nearly imperceptible loss in FSX, and major gains in Black Shark, I'd give it a thumbs up!

That says nothing about the desktop user experience which is certainly much better than XP, and reportedly a bit better than Vista. I wouldnt so much blame the OS for any hits, it actually appears to handle resources with much more intelligence than XP does - the apps you run just have to allow it to do that!

[edit] Here are the other benchmarks I've run with Win 7 vs XP - Nothing fancy, but quick and dirty and get's the job done: http://www.txsquadron.com/forum/index.php?topic=2675.0

Last edited by TX-EcoDragon; 01-16-2009 at 02:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-21-2009, 08:47 AM
DKoor's Avatar
DKoor DKoor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Croatia, East Side
Posts: 377
Default

Haha valuing my free time, don't experiment since XP works like charm.
/Log off
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-21-2009, 11:18 AM
PE_Tigar PE_Tigar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DKoor View Post
Haha valuing my free time, don't experiment since XP works like charm.
/Log off
Thanks for nothing If you have nothing to say on topic you could at least stay away.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.