Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-25-2014, 10:25 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

The P-47N I always thought was interesting... different shape to the wings, greater range, HVAR rockets, used in the late stages of the Pacific war.

The P-47M is interesting too although we pretty much already have it in the non-descript P-47D, 1944 which is meant to simulate a field mod/hot rodded P-47D-27. Pretty much bang on in performance.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-26-2014, 03:37 AM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
The P-47N I always thought was interesting... different shape to the wings, greater range, HVAR rockets, used in the late stages of the Pacific war.

The P-47M is interesting too although we pretty much already have it in the non-descript P-47D, 1944 which is meant to simulate a field mod/hot rodded P-47D-27. Pretty much bang on in performance.
Could you modify the 3D model of the non-descript P-47D by adding a dorsal fin fillet and add dive recover flaps and call it the P-47M??
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-26-2014, 04:18 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighterace View Post
Could you modify the 3D model of the non-descript P-47D by adding a dorsal fin fillet and add dive recover flaps and call it the P-47M??
I don't have the talent. Someone could.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-27-2014, 06:21 AM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

Any new P-47s would be a great addition to this game
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-22-2014, 01:09 AM
trashcanman trashcanman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighterace View Post
Any new P-47s would be a great addition to this game
Just fixing the existing P-47 razorback bar would be a good start



Look! No "refraction" required !!!

I was going to post the rest but unless I can find hard evidence that the Lw flew them in combat it ain't gonna get done ....

Sad really. Let the ban commence
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-22-2014, 01:14 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trashcanman View Post
Just fixing the existing P-47 razorback bar would be a good start



Look! No "refraction" required !!!

I was going to post the rest but unless I can find hard evidence that the Lw flew them in combat it ain't gonna get done ....

Sad really. Let the ban commence
You mean how the gunsight is mounted too low? It'd be nice to fix that one.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-01-2014, 01:03 AM
trashcanman trashcanman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
You mean how the gunsight is mounted too low? It'd be nice to fix that one.
Ah yes, the old chestnut of the gun sight too low …. I take it you are still part of the TD disinformation collective then

Please allow me to present the facts of the Fw 190 bar and the P-47 razorback bar.

For many years the representation within IL-2 of the gun sight views associated with both of these contemporary aircraft has been viewed as flawed given that both had the bottom part of the view obscured.

For reasons that are best left alone for the purposes of this discussion, the excellent Luftwaffe fighter has had many vociferous champions of the need to remove this visual obstruction. I believe it is fair to say that these arguments can be summarised as the need to remove “the bar”.

There were a few that advocated a similar argument in favour of the same consideration being given to the less fashionable American aircraft.

Despite the passionately presented arguments, over many years, the developers of IL-2 decided to maintain their original representation of the gun sight views of both aircraft.

However, once the IL-2 files were modified by Team Diablos, the Fw 190 bar was immediately removed. The sole justification for this, and in the face of all other contrary evidence, was given as the dispersion of light waves at the perimeter of different densities of glass.

However, despite the far clearer evidence for the need to apply the same correction to the P-47, we have yet to see this even discussed or acknowledged. Every now and again there will be a vague promise of the Jug cockpit being “reworked”, “looked at” or just PM abuse, threats and forum bullying.

As I have said both here and in other online discussions, much of what TD is doing to mod IL-2 is excellent however there are many people that are concerned with the lack of consistency and transparency about changes being made that significantly alter the historical integrity of the game.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.