4.13 development update discussion and feedback

[yak9utpro]

Does anybody else hope to see the monster JU-390 in the skies of IL-2?
Even in 4.14 it will be nice to see some flyable beasts (ME-323,JU-390,B-17,B-29) by the way if you happen to make the B-29 flyable you should add a bomb (you know what i'm talking about ☢

[majorfailure]

Originally Posted by yak9utpro

Does anybody else hope to see the monster JU-390 in the skies of IL-2?
Even in 4.14 it will be nice to see some flyable beasts (ME-323,JU-390,B-17,B-29) by the way if you happen to make the B-29 flyable you should add a bomb (you know what i'm talking about ☢

If you really want that, I think mods do have it.
I wouldn't add it to IL-2, for me its beyond the scope of the game, as this is a tactical combat flight sim, and weapons off mass destruction are best left out. There would be serious balancing issues IMHO.

[ElAurens]

The B 29 is available in HSFX, with the Atomic option.

The Bomb is very undermodeled, I suspect because of computer performance issues.

If you really feel the need to drop massive ordnance, the Pe8 with it 5000 kilo
bomb is already in the game and the bomb does far more damage than than the "atom" bomb in mods.

The B 29 is an interesting aircraft to fly, and is in another world compared to any other bomber in the sim, as it should be.

[Fighterace]

Originally Posted by majorfailure

If you really want that, I think mods do have it.
I wouldn't add it to IL-2, for me its beyond the scope of the game, as this is a tactical combat flight sim, and weapons off mass destruction are best left out. There would be serious balancing issues IMHO.

Simply don't add the Atomic bombs to its load outs!!

[yak9utpro]

ok with the ☢ bomb if you don't want it don't use it.
In mods the UP3 and HSFX cockpits are lame.
I know that the game might be affected by this ☢ bomb,anyway with or without it the B-29 would be awsome!
As for the PE-8 with the FAB-5000 is great but I'm greedy on power of destruction,I accept it.

[Rufe]

Mission builder editor

The file selector frame is, initiallly, too small.
Whenever I enter the into mission editor i have to extend the frame.
It would be nice that file selector remember the last frame size...
...or increase the default frame size.

[SPAD-1949]

Originally Posted by Rufe

Mission builder editor

The file selector frame is, initiallly, too small.
Whenever I enter the into mission editor i have to extend the frame.
It would be nice that file selector remember the last frame size...
...or increase the default frame size.

+1

And it would be nice, if I paste a set of copied objects, that the entire Set of objects can be rotated keeping its relative orientation towards each other.

Eg.: If I create a AAA position with 4 guns, sandbag barriers, tents and trenches, copy it to another point and want to change its orientation, this does not work.

Each object rotates around its original insert point.

[IceFire]

Originally Posted by SPAD-1949

+1

And it would be nice, if I paste a set of copied objects, that the entire Set of objects can be rotated keeping its relative orientation towards each other.

Eg.: If I create a AAA position with 4 guns, sandbag barriers, tents and trenches, copy it to another point and want to change its orientation, this does not work.

Each object rotates around its original insert point.

Under "Edit" "Rotate Objects" you can toggle this behaviour. The only issue is that it doesn't remember what you select between loading the FMB so you have to recheck it every time you load up the FMB.

[yak9utpro]

yesterday i told you about nice bombers,today i have another idea which will be an easy job for TD the YAK9-UT NS-45 version (the UT had a lot of mods on its main cannon).
The yak9k is good but the U series has one more cannon and better perfomance.
This exists on mod UP3 but it's not as it should be.
and yes the ut can bring this cannon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakovlev_Yak-9#Variants