Acceleration comparisons

MaxGunz · #1 07-24-2013, 10:30 PM

Those are the ones in IL2Compare 4.07m, the last IL2C I have.

IceFire · #2 07-25-2013, 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaxGunz

Those are the ones in IL2Compare 4.07m, the last IL2C I have.

There's a 4.11 IL2 Compare kicking around. Haven't seen a 4.12 yet...

Monty_Thrud · #3 07-25-2013, 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IceFire

There's a 4.11 IL2 Compare kicking around. Haven't seen a 4.12 yet...

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=29744

Scroll down for 4.11

MaxGunz · #4 07-25-2013, 10:54 AM

I've had IL2C 4.11 and 4.07m for a while it turns out, just only a shortcut to 4.07m on the desktop. 4.07m version is off now, 4.11 link in place and holy cow now I see the confusion! I forgot about the rabbit Spitfire versions and now I have to wonder why is there no P-51D with empty fuselage tank and CoG to match? Then we could hear a new verse or chorus to 'stang-whining based upon stick forces too high.

pandacat · #5 08-01-2013, 10:52 PM

It's quite interesting to see post-510kph, 2700rpm actually accelerates faster than 3000rpm for p51c. Btw, do you have similar data on P51Ds? 5nt and 20na. I would expect slightly worse performance. Also, it's surprising to see 109G series has slower acceleration than mustangs given 109 has higher power to mass ratio.

MaxGunz · #6 08-02-2013, 01:55 AM

Consider how CSP's work in the case of the P-51.

pandacat · #7 08-02-2013, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaxGunz

Consider how CSP's work in the case of the P-51.

But doesn't everybody else have CSP, too? Spit, 109, 190? Or P51's CSP is somewhat special? For spit and 109, it seems from the charts that 3000rpm always accelerates faster than 2700rpm