|
|
|
|
#1
03-24-2013, 08:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Here's a little something to hold you over: |
|
#2
03-24-2013, 09:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Little sneak peak to 4.13 - only for calmly waiting H.75 lovers:
 (yes, I know, the reticle is still wrong, it'll have the correct one)
__________________
 ---------------------------------------------- For bugreports, help and support contact: daidalos.team@googlemail.com For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications: IL-Modeling Bible Last edited by EJGr.Ost_Caspar; 03-24-2013 at 09:57 PM. |
|
#3
03-25-2013, 06:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
03-24-2013, 09:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks.
Such an elegant little aeroplane. I wish there was one flying on our side of the Atlantic.
__________________
 Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#6
03-24-2013, 10:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh please don't tell me the 75 has been pushed back.
__________________
Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#9
03-24-2013, 11:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Any Curtiss is better than no Curtiss.
Well, maybe not the Seamew... 
__________________
Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
