Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

View Poll Results: Do you prefer graphical aspect of ROF or COD one's ?
ROF 26 18.71%
COD 113 81.29%
Voters: 139. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-15-2012, 10:54 AM
Mikmak Mikmak is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 23
Default Graphical aspect preference ROF vs COD and other stuff

In terms of graphical aspect, which one do you prefer ? ROF or COD ?

Last edited by JG52Uther; 12-19-2012 at 06:19 AM.
  #2  
Old 12-15-2012, 10:56 AM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

Theres no contest. RoF is a game for 2010, CoD is a sim for 2012 and beyond (or it was)
Anyone mention cockpit shadows (or God forbid, cockpit damage...)
I still play both, one when I need a quick arcade shoot em up experience, the other when I want to experience a flight sim.
  #3  
Old 12-15-2012, 12:28 PM
Mustang Mustang is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 106
Thumbs down

I JUST INSTALL ROF - only just curious
Then I go to play offline,

I rise up the ROF deafault graphics a bit, and do some clicks
I know the limitations of a NVIDIA 560 Ti
No Antialiasing
Aniso only x4
Only 4 Light sources
Other settings High or ON....But not at maximun

ROF RUNS WORSE THAN CLOD!!!! ( less fps) AND LOOKS WORSE !!!

I get 32 FPS ... 19 over the trees


My system

Win 7 64bit

AMD PhenomII 965 BE @ 3.8 GHZ

Ram 8 Gigas

Graphics Card NVIDIA 560 TI 1 GB 1600x900 , Drivers updated !!!


ROF GIVE LEES FPS THAN CLOD.

I CANT UNDERSTAND I PLAY MANY GAMES @ FULL .

Some settings in ROF, Kill my PC.
Where this optimization??? if I must put the graphics in medium.



  #4  
Old 12-15-2012, 12:47 PM
Verhängnis Verhängnis is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: I come from a Sea, Up, Over. :)
Posts: 295
Default

I found RoF to be very optimizable with the many diverse graphic options available.

I like some aspects of the graphics in RoF and the camera, and for me, the dynamic 3d damage model is steps ahead of CoD imo, which kept too many legacy features of 1946, there are so many things I hate about the 3d, visual damage model in IL-2.

Overall however, graphics in CoD > RoF.
  #5  
Old 12-15-2012, 01:04 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustang View Post
I JUST INSTALL ROF - only just curious
Then I go to play offline,

I rise up the ROF deafault graphics a bit, and do some clicks
I know the limitations of a NVIDIA 560 Ti
No Antialiasing
Aniso only x4
Only 4 Light sources
Other settings High or ON....But not at maximun

ROF RUNS WORSE THAN CLOD!!!! ( less fps) AND LOOKS WORSE !!!

I get 32 FPS ... 19 over the trees


My system

Win 7 64bit

AMD PhenomII 965 BE @ 3.8 GHZ

Ram 8 Gigas

Graphics Card NVIDIA 560 TI 1 GB 1600x900 , Drivers updated !!!


ROF GIVE LEES FPS THAN CLOD.

I CANT UNDERSTAND I PLAY MANY GAMES @ FULL .

Some settings in ROF, Kill my PC.
Where this optimization??? if I must put the graphics in medium.



Turn off super sampling and dither vegetation...
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
  #6  
Old 12-15-2012, 03:39 PM
ems9 ems9 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 37
Default

IMO there is no doubt. CloD have much better graphics. Besides that for me the FM looks better, plus the the DM which is more complex and realistic.
  #7  
Old 12-15-2012, 04:29 PM
jamesdietz's Avatar
jamesdietz jamesdietz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle,WashingtonUSA
Posts: 758
Default

Can I hedge my bet a little? RoF isn't bad...in fact it is fine , its just that CloD is better...who knows what Studio 777 will come up with for BoS ? Working with a snowy landscape may offer all kinds of improvement possibilities...
  #8  
Old 12-15-2012, 05:30 PM
Lexicon Lexicon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 24
Default

The new team won't get any good feedback from the CLOD crowd unless they
do something drastic to the graphic aspect for the next Sturmovik. Maybe they are planning to do so, but Jason is very careful about revealing his future plans...He knows the story here...Very edgy clientèle....Don't flame me, but you should take a look at the new upgrade WT has done today...Still in BETA, but in 2 years from now, even if this game is not "totally hardcore" , it will be the new graphic standard for sure in WWII sim/game....It has already surpassed CLOD by a good stretch at this point....
So to hold its ground, BOS will have to look at least 2012....in 2014....

SAlute !
  #9  
Old 12-18-2012, 08:47 PM
kendo65 kendo65 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 908
Default

I didn't vote in the above poll as personally I like certain aspects from each game.

For COD - the lighting and sky (way ahead here),

the cockpits,

the clouds (limited variety and no weather variation to speak of but the basic appearance is better for me in COD),

the sea/water (though awaiting ROF's revamped water coming with the new Channel map)

For ROF - the land terrain (personal opinion - I just could never warm to COD's terrain mainly because of the colour balance and the haphazard trees. IT's a strange one - I recognise COD's technical superiority but my gut just screams NO...! ROF isn't perfect, but it just sits with me better, but then I prefer some of the il-2 maps to COD as well!),

AA - makes a difference (at least on my 1680x1050 screen)

The view control system - very nice, easily controlled and functional.

Weather - flying through a rain storm in ROF with the water pouring off your goggles. Also flying through heavy cloud formations - sometimes spectacular looking in ROF.



I think it's pretty much a tie on smoke and flame effects and explosions.
__________________
i5-2500K @3.3GHz / 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600 / Asus P8P67 / GTX-260 (216) / WD 500GB
Samsung 22" 1680x1050 / Win7 64 Home Premium
CH Combat Stick / CH Pro Throttle / Simped Rudder Pedals
  #10  
Old 12-18-2012, 09:04 PM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,719
Default

I guess Clod wins
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.