Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2012, 11:37 AM
tf_neuro tf_neuro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sol III, Milky Way
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomcatViP View Post
I understand your disapointment as the game was not perfect out of the box from the release but...c'mon we payed 60bucks for 2 years of playing.
~S
Personally, I paid some 50 euros for... maybe 2 months of poor quality playing. Before the last two beta patches the game was completely unplayable, and even now it's just barely playable.

It has a lot of potential, I think we all agree on that one, and I guess we also agree when it comes to giving credit for the good work to Luthier & team. However, the game is still a long way from delivering anything but a tiny fraction of what was promised.

So, IMO the right thing to do is to fix what's already in game, make it match the promises, and then i'm ready to bet that everyone will be throwing money at it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-21-2012, 12:12 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tf_neuro View Post
Personally, I paid some 50 euros for... maybe 2 months of poor quality playing. Before the last two beta patches the game was completely unplayable, and even now it's just barely playable.

It has a lot of potential, I think we all agree on that one, and I guess we also agree when it comes to giving credit for the good work to Luthier & team. However, the game is still a long way from delivering anything but a tiny fraction of what was promised.

So, IMO the right thing to do is to fix what's already in game, make it match the promises, and then i'm ready to bet that everyone will be throwing money at it.
The game will never be fixed beyond what it is now unless you buy the sequel when we are told the impovements that come with it will also improve CoD. It will never match all the promises. Its just an unpleasant fact of life.

What is your rig and what are your settings?
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-21-2012, 12:29 PM
BRIGGBOY BRIGGBOY is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brigg in Lincolnshire
Posts: 275
Default

yes I will buy the sequel without a shadow of a doubt as it will improve clod to where it should be. But also iam looking forward to flying the yak 1 and 109 f4.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-21-2012, 01:27 PM
planespotter planespotter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 446
Default

Heinkill review updated for final patch. not unfair quite is balanced. but I dont agree on Su26 is fun

http://bobgamehub.blogspot.dk/p/clif...er-review.html
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-21-2012, 04:15 PM
juanjo juanjo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by planespotter View Post
Heinkill review updated for final patch. not unfair quite is balanced. but I dont agree on Su26 is fun

http://bobgamehub.blogspot.dk/p/clif...er-review.html
Excellent review. I completely agree with all what he says.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-21-2012, 05:56 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by planespotter View Post
Heinkill review updated for final patch. not unfair quite is balanced. but I dont agree on Su26 is fun

http://bobgamehub.blogspot.dk/p/clif...er-review.html
LOL the guy is such a comedian.... "There is no comparison for example with other prop sims such as Rise of Flight, or sim-lite products such as War Thunder"

AHAHAHAHA brilliant he should give up "reviews" and become a comedian. ROFL
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-21-2012, 06:37 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
LOL the guy is such a comedian.... "There is no comparison for example with other prop sims such as Rise of Flight, or sim-lite products such as War Thunder"

AHAHAHAHA brilliant he should give up "reviews" and become a comedian. ROFL

I think you have yourself look a right nonce here, Krupi.
Heinkill clearly contextualises that statement to show CloD's poor handling of trees and clouds which these two sims do a great job of modelling.

The only comedic anecdote here is your inability to read. At no point is he suggesting these two sims are better as sims overall. He even makes the point to note that War Thunder is a 'sim-lite'.
__________________
Luthier: If not for your guys' criticism and incredibly high standards, we'd never have become what we are. Keep it up!

Source for the sceptical: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...11&postcount=9
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-21-2012, 06:46 PM
jayrc's Avatar
jayrc jayrc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 339
Default

With over 880 hrs flying online I can say for sure that this game is great and very playable, 80+ players says it all, come join us guys and gals, it's only going to get better from here on out ~S~
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-21-2012, 07:06 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
I think you have yourself look a right nonce here, Krupi.
Heinkill clearly contextualises that statement to show CloD's poor handling of trees and clouds which these two sims do a great job of modelling.

The only comedic anecdote here is your inability to read. At no point is he suggesting these two sims are better as sims overall. He even makes the point to note that War Thunder is a 'sim-lite'.
I totally agree with the trees but as far as the clouds go they work well for me and look quite good I just wish we could add more, hopefully BOM etc will bring that

Oh and it best have aa.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.

Last edited by JG52Krupi; 10-21-2012 at 07:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.